New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2002-00248 Ltrs
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Contracts
>
2011 Contracts scanned to Verify
>
2002-00248 Ltrs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2011 8:40:00 AM
Creation date
12/6/2010 9:54:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Contract
COE_Contract_Number
2002-00248
PW_Document_Type_Contract
Correspondence
Organization
Property Owners East
PW_Department
Public Works
Contract_Administrator
Aanderud
Contract_Manager
Gallup
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 • <br />OAKES Joanne M <br />From:KLOPE Paul W <br />Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:49 AM <br />To: OAKES Jeanne M <br />Subject: RE: Contracts Moving to PWM w/you <br />I don't recall if I responded to you about this note, so just in case, here is my response. I think it <br />would be best if the contracts need to stay "alive" that they go out to PWM with Steve. <br />From: OAKES Jeanne M <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 3:21 PM <br />To: KLOPE Paul W <br />Subject: RE: Contracts Moving to PWM w/you <br />Paul: remember this email from you (see below email string) concerning contracts that had <br />Steve Gallup listed as project manager, and should they move out to PWM with him? I had <br />this on my list yet to get to you, and here they finally-are for your look-see(the three <br />contracts still in question). PWM is asking if these should also move out there, and I need <br />your answer for these last three. Should they go to PWM with Steve or stay here, and if <br />stay here, who should I now list as the project manager/s? Here are the scanned contract <br />documents, and immediately below is what I see listed in our "contract tracking" online <br />system for review, termination and condition of termination dates. Please let me know if I <br />should change any of the dates and/or termination conditions. <br />1999-00216 E. Bank Bike Path Settlement Agreement with Marist High School- <br />permanent easements and settlement agreement for construction of E. Bank Bike Path. In <br />our contract system it is listed with review date of 6-10-2011, no termination date, and <br />permanent. <br />2002-00248 E. Bank Trail Agreement with KOGAP, PW Pipe, Pape and Peacehealth is <br />permanent easements and property agreements to construct E. Bank Bike Path. Our <br />contract system says review date of 3-1-2010, termination date of 3-1-2013, and "no entry" <br />for "condition of termination". Section 51 Term and Termination (Page 10) of the <br />agreement stipulates a completion date of 3-31-02 or when bikepath is completed, with <br />Section 9.9 Survival listing some articles in agreement surviving the termination of the <br />agreement. No notation in file as to why we have 3-1-2013 listed as term date. <br />2002-00250 E. Bank Bike Path Causeway Construction Agreement With+000AP, PW Pipe <br />and Pape is the property agreement so causeway could be built. We show review date of 3- <br />1-2010, term date of 3-3-30 and permanent. No notation in file as to why'we have 3-1-30 <br />listed as term date. <br />File: 1999-00216.pdf>> << File: 2002-00248.pdf << File: 2002-00250.pdf <br />Jeanne Oakes <br />Public Works-Engineering <br />541.682.5257 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.