#905124 LA Creekside Park (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

Page 2 of 4 . Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: SMITH Tammy D Subject: FW: funding for Creekside acquisition fYi, ~ _.w..~.___.... _ _~....._..._~._.....___.,,.____.._~.__.__._.___.~r. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~...__.~w._.,~ . From: CARLSON Becky A Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:01 PM To: PETERSON Tish A Subject: RE: funding for Creekside acquisition Yep...this could be a big deal if we should have used SDCs and not bond proceeds (I wish 1 knew what the original message from Phillip to Robin said, below, and how this came to their attention). If we are, indeed, going to have ahalf-million in additional 1998 bond proceeds to program and spend, then that information needs to be out there ASAP. Johnny & Carolyn are the right people to start this conversation with. f ~becky From: PETERSON Tish A Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:47 PM To: CARLSON Becky A Subject: FW: funding for Creekside acquisition fyi From: SMITH Tammy D Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:19 PM To: RISDAL Lacey L; CLARK Debbie D Cc: PETERSON Tish A Subject: RE: funding for Creekside acquisition Lacey, . Short recap of our conversation: This issue has not been resolved and is there a need to correct this 5 years later? Lacey is going to check with Johnny & Carolyn to see if there is a need to correct this transaction (should have been from Parks SDC and was paid from Park Bond). i _Tammy Smith _ _ _ From: RISDAL Lacey L Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:48 PM To: SMITH Tammy D; CLARK Debbie D Subject: F11V: funding for Creekside acquisition Tammy & Debbie, What is the next step here? It sounds like we need to do a correction? Do we need to loop Tish or Johnny in that we are recommending this correction so late in the game? Lacey Risc~`al, x=184.1 Financial Analyst Public yrj~f~k~ . 7/28/2006