New Search
Page 1 of 4 <br /> SMITH Tammy D <br /> From: CARLSON Becky A <br /> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:17 AM <br /> To: SMITH Tammy D; PETERSON Tish A <br /> Subject: RE: funding for Creekside acquisition <br /> I <br /> I'm satisfied with this outcome if Carolyn/Johnny feel it is justified and defensible. ~bc <br /> From: _SMITH Tammy D <br /> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:16 AM <br /> To: PETERSON Tish A; CARLSON Becky A <br /> Subject: FW: funding for Creekside acquisition <br /> <br /> i <br /> FYI <br /> Tammy Smith <br /> From: RISDAL Lacey L <br /> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:13 AM <br /> To: SMITH Tammy D <br /> Subject: RE: funding for Creekside acquisition <br /> Tammy, <br /> Johnny and Carolyn both feel that the acquisition of this park needs to stay with the Bond fund. This acquisition <br /> was counted as one of the neighborhood acquisitions under the bond, and if we move it out, then we will be short <br /> a requirement. In addition, they both feel the single occurrence of the hand-written notes found are not enough <br /> evidence to prove that we followed the plan of purchasing this site. So, with this, I am content in leaving this site <br /> where it was originally funded from. Let me know if you have any questions, <br /> Lacey Risdal, x4~S'=~1 <br /> .1~7'nanciccl .~l nalyst <br /> I'zrhlzc_i~'o~°ks _ _ <br /> Nlcrinterzance and Pa~Ics K Open ~S~aces <br /> From: SMITH Tammy D <br /> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:29 PM <br /> To: RISDAL Lacey L <br /> Subject: FW: funding for Creekside acquisition <br /> FYI <br /> Tammy Smith <br /> 1. <br /> -From: PETERSON Tish A <br /> 7/28/2006 <br /> <br />