New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-02-02-F (2)
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-02-02-F (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 9:18:32 AM
Creation date
6/4/2009 10:12:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Admin
Document_Date
6/25/2002
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
impact analysis does not negate the ability of the City Traffic Engineer to require improvements by <br />other means specified in the Eugene Code, 1971 or rules or regulations adopted thereunder. <br />3. In addition to the above criteria, if the Traffic Impact Analysis Review was required <br />based on R-9.8650-B-4. (EC 9.8670(4)), the improvements shall also address the structural capacity <br />of the street in the County's jurisdiction and address identified structural deficiencies, orreduction <br />in the useful life of existing street structures related to the proposed development. Improvements <br />may be needed to eliminate the identified structural deficiencies and to accommodate vehicle <br />impacts to structures. <br />R-9.8650-D Traffic Impact Analysis , IA.) -Determination of Peak Hour Trigs. <br />The deternunation of peak hour. trips shall be made by consulting the most current version <br />of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual. <br />R-9.8650-E Traffic Impact Anal, sy is (TIAI -Exception to Requirements. <br />As part of a Type II or III review, the City Planning Director, or designee, may grant an <br />exception to any or all of the content. requirements of R-9.8650-F when both of the following are. <br />met: <br />1. A development will generate less than 100 trips in any peak hour. <br />2. The applicant has demonstrated that submittal of the item(s) listed in R-9.8650-F is <br />not necessary in order to show compliance with the approval criteria of R-9.8650-C. <br />R-9.8650-F Traffic Impact Analysis (TIAI -Report Requirements. <br />Unless an exception is granted pursuant to R-9.8650-E, the following items are required as <br />part of a TIA: - <br />1. Report Certification. All traffic studies shall be prepared by or under the direct <br />supervision of a Professional Civil or Traffic Engineer currently licensed to practice within the State <br />of Oregon, and with special training and experience in transportation engineering and planning. The <br />engineer shall certify the TIA document by providing a signature and seal of approval. <br />2. Extent of Study Area. The applicant and the City Traffic Engineer, or designee shall <br />agree on the defined study area prior to commencement of the preparation of the TIA. The analysis <br />must include an examination of all site access drives, adjacent roadways, and other roadways and <br />intersections that will receive 50 or more additional peak hour trips as a result of completion of the <br />proposed development or land use application. <br />3. Selection of Horizon Years for Data Required by R-9.8650-F-4 to F-11. <br />Administrative Order - 3 <br />raadminord\rules\02stdstia2ao.wpd(06/19/02) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.