New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-02-28-F
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-02-28-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 9:28:48 AM
Creation date
6/4/2009 9:34:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Industrial Pretreatment
Document_Date
11/5/2002
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(b) To establish the affirmative- defense of upset, an industrial user must <br />demonstrate through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other <br />`' - ' ~ relevant evidence that: <br />(1) An upset occurred and the industrial user -can identify the specific <br />.cause(s) of the upset; <br />(2) The industrial user was at the time operating in a prudent manner and <br />in compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; and <br />(3) The industrial user has submitted the following information to the <br />Director within 12 hours of becoming aware of the upset. If this information <br />is provided orally, a written submission must be provided within five days. <br />a,- A description of the occurrence and cause of noncompliance; <br />° f <br />~` At:". <br />b. The period~c~fnoncompliance,including exact dates a~`nd times <br />or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is <br />expected to continue; <br />c. All steps being taken and/or planned to reduce, eliminate and <br />prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance; and <br />d. Evidence the industrial user took all reasonable steps to <br />minimize or prevent any discharge resulting from an upset. <br />(c) The industrial user seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset in an <br />enforcement proceeding shall have the burden of proof. <br />(d) Notwithstandingthisrule providing for the upset affirmative defense, to the <br />extent such an affirmative defense is not available to the City or the Metropolitan <br />Wastewater Management Commission, it is not available to the industrial user. <br />5. Single Operational Event. <br />(a) A single operational event is an exceptional incident which causes <br />simultaneous, unintentional, unknowing (not the result of a knowing act or <br />omission), temporarynoncompliance withmore than one effluent dischargepollutant <br />parameter. A single operational event does not include violations of the Eugene <br />Code, 1971 involving discharge without a Wastewater Discharge Permit or <br />noncompliance to the extent caused by improperly designed or inadequate treatment <br />facilities. A single operational event which leads to simultaneous violations of more <br />than one pollutant parameter shall be treated as a single violation. The industrial user <br />Administrative Order - 5 <br />C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OI.K61A5\021ndustrialPretreatment-2ao.wpd , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.