New Search
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 58-96-06-F-7 <br />Cit of the <br />Y Manager Pro Tem of the City of Eugene <br />AMENDING METROPOLITAN WASTEWgTER MANA <br />SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CRED EMENT COMMISSION (MWMC <br />ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER #58-95.06-F, ANp qNY OT , <br />ITS, AND REPEALING <br />HER ORDER IN CONFLICT <br />The City Manager Pro Tem of th <br /> <br />Administrative Order No. <br />58-96-06-F-1 <br />e City of Eugene finds as follows: <br />A• Sections 2.020 and 7.705 of the Eugene, Code, 1971 authoriz <br />of Eugene to determine and set fees and charges to be imposed <br />of municipal pro ert a the City Manager of the City <br />Section 7.710 of the Eugene ICodee1971f urther a by the City for services <br />p rmits, and specifically systems development charges. <br />by administrative order, the methodologies used for esfablishin C+tY Manager to adopt and/or amend <br />and provides this may be effected concurrent with .the estab ' <br />develo 9 the systems development charges, <br />pment charge. hshment or revision of a systems <br />t3- In accordance with the procedures set forth therein on <br />Order. No. 58-96-06 and notified the Mayor and Cit <br />of Eugene SDC ~ May 09, 1996 !issued Administrative <br />Methodology to allow the adjustment of SDC charges atnd credi • 1 <br />occurs, to establish a systems development char a ()amend the City <br />for commercial and .industrial develo g methodolo is after development <br />_ amend the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Comn , gY classification of "large Volume User" <br />9 9 more than 100,000 gallons per da <br />thereto, as calculated b mission Y, and (2) <br />incorporated therein by reference, n~caud'ng the att h in the NotiMce~tached asation Fees and Credits <br />Orders in conflict, including Administrative Order Number #58-95- _ Exhibit A thereto and <br />achments thereto; and to repeal any Administrative <br />C. - 06 f. <br />The current City of Eugene Systems Development Charges SDC <br />set forth in Table #1 of Exhibit A, to the Notice, and reflected o <br />Engineer's review of the Nations! Construction ( s) for each system, were <br />a 2.15 /o increase based on the City <br />for the precedin Cost Index, published by the <br />of the Februa g twelve months. These are automatically adjusted each year ursu <br />therefore have not been rDepl meted dology and were included therein fore p ant to Section 2.3 <br />n Exhibit A hereto ase of reference only, and <br />~• The Notice was published on Ma 9 <br />circulation .within the Cit Y , 1996 in the Register Guard, a newspaper of general <br />interested persons dunn ~ posted in four public places, and was made available for ins echo <br />exclusive of holida s g normal business hours (8:00 am to 5:00 p n by <br />Y ), as more fully setJor}h in the notice. In addition thereto, a <br />session was held on June 19th from 5:30 Pm Monday through Friday, <br />could be submitted thereon for a period of 45 days from the public verbal comment <br />p.m. The Notice provided that written comments <br />consideration would be given to verbal comments at the June 19th sess' <br />date of posting and publication, and that <br />received, to which 1 make the following findings: <br />~on• Numerous comments were <br />Comments on MWMC SDC Fees and Credits: One comment <br />SDC fees were too high, while other comments objected to the ro <br />they were too low to provide for a full cost recove asserted that the .MWMC <br />would recover the true costs. <br />ry, and should be stab shed in an amount hat <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />