New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-96-26-F (2)
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-96-26-F (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 10:13:09 AM
Creation date
6/3/2009 9:30:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Erosion Prevention
Document_Date
1/22/1996
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/f <br />Finding: All construction activities that disturb land are affected by the program <br />including the placement of building and landscape materials in the public right-of--way. <br />Therefore, there is no need to adjust the rule. <br />Comment 16: Why were the necessary materials needed for review, such as the <br />manual, template, sensitive areas map not available for review? <br />Finding: Most of these materials have been available for review since December <br />1995 and their availability has been announced publicly. <br />Comment 17: Where does the program apply? <br />Finding: Within the city limits of Eugene. <br />Comment 18: Who is responsible for release of hazardous substances at a <br />construction site. <br />Findin :For activities requiring an erosion permit, the permittee (property owner <br />or easement holey) is responsible for meeting the requirements of the program and permit. <br />For non-permitted conditions, property owner or easement holder. <br />Comment 19: The City Council should review the Administrative Rule prior to <br />~ finalization. <br />Findin :City Councilors were provided copies of the proposed rule and fee schedule <br />for their review. <br />Comment 20: Program will affect cost of homes. <br />Findin :This issue was raised at the time the ordinance was considered. With most <br />of .the single family dwellings requiring a permit, costs to this group were considered <br />minimised while benefits to water quality were raised. The ordinance was approved.. This <br />issue is out of the scope of the Administrative Rule. Therefore, there is no need for rule <br />adjustments at this time. <br />..- <br />Comment 21: Blanket permits should be allowed for new subdivisions. <br />Finding: The umbrella permit, R6.645-F3.2, provides this application. Therefore, <br />there is no need to adjust the rule at this time. <br />Comment 22: Stop work orders should only apply to the area of violation. <br />Erosion Prevention Administrative Rule R-6.645 - 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.