New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-97-02-F-2
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-97-02-F-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 10:30:05 AM
Creation date
6/3/2009 9:14:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
SDC
Document_Date
4/30/1997
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
l <br />h <br />d <br />d S <br />Amend u <br />e <br />c <br />e <br />ment Process an <br />1/6/97 Notification of intent to amend the SDC Methodology sent to interested parties. . <br />1/21/97 Notice of proposed changes will be provided to City Council and Mayor, published in the Register-Guard, and <br /> copies of the proposed methodology changes and fee schedule will be made available for review at Eugene City <br /> Hatl, Public Works Buildinglobby, Permit and Information Center Lobby,.and Eugene Public L(brary. <br />1/21/97. A 30-day public comment period will open. Those wishing to comment on the proposed changes must do so in <br /> writing. These comments should be sent to the Public Works Department via fax (541-682-5032) or by mail to 858 <br /> Pearl Street, Eugene, OR 97401. <br />1/30197 Public information session will be held in the Sloat Room at the Permit andlnformation Center in the Atrium <br /> Building, at 99 W,. 10th Avenue #rom 6:30 - 8:00 p.m. Staff will be available to respond to questions regarding the <br /> proposed changes. <br />2!20/97 <br />~ Public comment period will close. <br />~ <br />3/1/97 <br />New SOC Methodology and rates will apply to all valid building permits applied for on or after this date. <br />What Accounts for the Increased Rates? <br /> ,.Eugene's arterial and collector network. „These examples <br />The proposed rate changes are necessary,to more accurately are inputs into: the Transportation SDC, and bring the anaiy- <br />reflect the Ci s actual costs to construct new facilities. No <br />~ - <br />sis into conformance with the assumptions currently being <br />changes are proposed in the basic Council-adopted policies developed for TransPlan, the regional transportation, plan- <br />which frame the. SDC rate structure. The definition of the ring process. <br />individual. "systems" for purposes of costxecovery, and the <br />types. of development which participate iri individual sys- See the attached table "City of Eugene Current and Proposed <br />tem costs, will remainthe same. The increases are reflective ' SDCs" for a listing of the current and proposed rates. <br />of changed prices for the construction of major capi#al im- <br />provements needed to serve new.development. , <br />How Does .Eugene Compare to <br /> Other Communities? <br />When the City revised its SDC ordinance in 1991, the rate <br />structure was based in part upon an evaluation of system Many Oregon communities are experiencing increases in <br />costs, including existing reserve capacity as well'as planned construction costs.. In 1995; City staff gathered comparative <br />improvements, as described in master plans and the Capi- data for a number of Oregon communities' SDC rates. That <br />tal Improvement Plan (CIP). The cost to construct the information has been updated to reflect current rates. <br />planned system as well as the value of the existing system Eugene's proposed changes would result in fees that are in <br />available to serve new development was reestimated iri 1996. the middle of the range relative to thesepther communities. <br />.The analysis shows that these costs have increased on aver- See the attached charts "Comparison of SDCs; for 5 Sample <br />age by 65% to 75%, depending upon the system. When the Developments".for a graphical comparison of rates for five <br />effect of cost adjustments adopted since 1991 is factored out, project types. <br />the resulting fee increases range from 40-50%, again vary- ~ ' ~ ' <br />ing by the individual system. ~ • ~ ~ <br />The annual inflation adjustments which have been put in The following documents are available by requesting cop- <br />place since 1991 relied on a national index (the Engineering ies from the Public Works Department at 682-5291: <br />News-Record Construction Cost Index) which has not kept <br />pace withthe inflation in construction costs locally. Just as <br />• The proposed SDC Methodology document showing <br />the average price to construct a single family home has in-' text fo be changed: <br />. creased 60%-65% since 1991, the cost to construct streets, • The financial analysis prepared for the City by Lane <br />sewers, bike paths, and parks has-risen dramatically in re- CounciTof Governments regarding changes in construe- <br />sponse to a number of local economic factors.. These in- tion costs. <br />elude the price of land: (a particularly strong factor in the <br />Parks SDC), the high demand for construction makerial and <br />If your organization would like to request a brief presenta- <br />laborers,and the effect of environmentaland legal changes.; tion by staff regarding the proposed changes, please call th <br />SDC Coordinator a# 682-6823. In addition, the City main- <br />The final proposed rates also reflect the effect of updating tams a list of interested parties who are notified of changes <br />non-cost variables in the methodology, such as the average. to the SDC methodology and rates. In order to add your <br />trip length, and the percentage of each trip, which uses name to the list, please contact the SDC Coordinator. ; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.