New Search
7.4.3 Credi# Distribution in the Absence'of Directions from an Approved Sdc Credit <br />Application <br />In the event #hat the property'owner(s) have been notifed of pending SDC credits, but <br />the SDC Credit Applica#iori has no# been completed by the property owner(s) and <br />approvetl by the Ci#y Engineer within Bo days of written notification, with the.: <br />exception of cases where the recovery of credit through an equivalent assessment <br />is uncertain, the credit will be` distributed ;by thee: "equal iat" method. All eligible lots <br />ar building sites will be ides#ied, and the credit will be distributed in an equal: <br />amount to each of #hese eligible lots ar building sites, Credit applied under this <br />policy will not be eligible #a be appealed. Development for whicha permit is issued <br />prior to administration of <credi# disbursal or approval by City staff will not tie _ <br />;:. <br />considered eligible for credit distr~bu#ion. <br />?.4.4' Changes`#o An Approved SDC Credit Application <br />Any modifica#ions to the distribution of credits must be approved by the City <br />Engineer and are :outlined in the SDC Policies and Procedures. Such modifications <br />will apply only to remaining credit balances and undeveloped tots or building sites: <br />For credit distributions. established by the City using the "equal lot" :method, the <br />property owner(s) may change the distribution a# any time with the submission and <br />approva[ by the Cify Engineer; of a,SDC Formal' Credit Application: Far. other credit <br />distribufian methods previously established by an applicant, a new appl~cat~vn may: <br />tie submr#~ed end approved by the City Eng+r~eer <br />7f~ : t~eGiSt+a~i ~» ~>~it Ap{a~;~ca#~an~. <br />~'~ty M'ariageir or #x,Mager';~<;i;?ignee shatii approve, cartdrttc~d~lly approve, or ~er~ <br />a~t;atppiieat~t~n iii wrttirtg, Set~lt%~:F;ot'~h the reaac~n for the dee~t;#btl Such~a declst~&:i'~1# <br />lye mailed or personalty delivered tt~ the'applicant. ~ _ <br />7.6 Credit and; dmpa~t f~eductiart 13uratiort <br />C,reclfis granted,~ndei^~1'-es methodology document .shall be' wrl! lie avalab#e ft~r,,~se tt tc ` <br />,;.:..:. <br />a~.m~umum of ~t1`ye~s,firom the,date of the orig~na Ylri~#ten natificatit~t~' Dredt rema~n~ng <br />a'€#~ir'the ten yet` ~er~od vvi`ll net be apP~e±~ #o 'sub~equer~t' permi#s: <br />lrnpfi# ~nedu;Gtio~;ls=gr~tt~d Lnder,s met~pdology d~trm~rtfi may; be used untt l staCh tt`m~~ <br />ase ~ari~gram ci~ rrrtprbve~~rii<Srrit~ lahgi`"cont,nue'tcs provrde the antiCcpated retluc#aon <br />,,. <br />trr demand, and the '~j~.r h:a~s;-~i~~stermined that assurances or agreements from tFlo <br />developer; owner, pr awi~ers ~~[ccessors; are no longer adequa#e #a ensure that the <br />pr'agram or facility waif cc?htattwe to function as planned for the agreed'upan trrne,>period; <br />8.0 Appeals <br />An appeal. by an applicant or a permittee of any decision of the City Manager or the Manager's <br />designee under these Methodologies shalt be governed by EC 7.735 and must be filed and the, appeal <br />fee paid within 15 working days of the date of the decision.. Such appeals shall be in writing and filed <br />at the City Manager's office. The appeal fee, as`°establ~shed;under EC 2;020, can be'faund in the <br />., <br />current odopted SDC-'Fee schedule in Appendix G. <br />Proposed Methodologies: City. of Eugene SDCs (Effective March. 01, 1997) Page 21 <br />