New Search
(b) that it would otherwise:: have"to be constructed: or acquired-at public expense <br />and. is eligible for funding with Systems Development Charge dollars under <br />the. current policies of the City Council;; <br />oc <br />(c) that the.. City can recover: credits through collection -of an equivalent <br />` ~ assessment from benefitted properties, or for which the`. City-:Council has' <br />formed a Local Improvement District in accordance with provisions in Eugene ' <br />;: <br />Code 6.61.0 (6) or 7.407 (3), <br />7.2.3 Previous Payment or Use <br />In calculating the'credits given: under this section, theCity'IVlanager or the Manager's <br />designee steal! :apply credit only to the developments for which the previous' use ar <br />payment can be verified. Credi# fQr previous use will be based on the last known <br />verifiable use and the:: burden of proof is on the appiicartt to ,provide adequate <br />documentation. <br />7.2.'3.1 Pre~xisting;Developtnent Credit <br />When an .::.applicant for development of vacant land provides" reasonable <br />evidence that the land was previously improved with structure(s)'which wale <br />demolished within 5 ;years of the application, a? reduction fqr the demoltshed. <br />structure.{s) shat! b~.,;.granted provided a reduction fQr the demalrshet~: <br />s#ructure(s) has;no,# ~ei~:~?'-Vtt~~~iY.given. " <br />7.2.E City Cost cif Gonst~~a4n Crgdt# <br />Irrcaiculating the creditsc~tnur~d!er##~ts fiction ~h"e City Manar~er or tte l~lafiager's <br />"~. <br />designee shall, estimate the casti~f;#rNe+ captta;l improvement based upon ^~+rhat't#~E~z CC#y <br />would pay were it to ca`~tru+C~:~t~h„ ~m~rtt~vemer-ts: <br />7.2:5 , Revenue Collect'i~r~~f~r Equrraieni`~ Assessmeitit or S_pec~at Benefit Credx# <br />' Wtzen an equivalent as~esst~rrertt or.;`:sp~ci~l benefit assessment ~a ~alfected' where <br />,,. , . " .. <br />new de~e#iipinet'itconnects tc`a-~ubiic~rnprovement for which the Ctty` has granted <br />a credi#~under 7.2.2 c above, the repu>n cWlected~net oftha~c' ,. <br />() . < ( osts afi collectlcyrt): <br />shall be deposited: in the 5DC fund ftul;he Sys to which connection was made end <br />for: which the credit was given ttn~@~SS~t~1?~ ADC fund has been. reimbursed for the <br />credit from other City funds,S>ff tfite ~#`ui~d. has been reimbursed in advance from <br />` other City funds,: the re~renu±~ Cnlte~teci wttl be `deposited to the 'City #und ;~nth~ch: <br />reimbursed the SDC fund. <br />7.3 Revocation of Credit and Impact Reduptori' <br />If a capital improvement is -hot constructed ar a program is not iristtutetl or ceases to <br />function as designed, for which a credit or impact reduction in SDCs has :been given within <br />the time required;by these Methodologies, the credit or impact reduction may be revoked <br />Proposed Methodologies: City of Eugene SDCs {Effective March 01, 1997) Page 19 <br />