New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 97-09-F
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 97-09-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 10:49:55 AM
Creation date
6/3/2009 8:23:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
ROW
Document_Date
6/30/1997
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Finding: Staff agrees that the term "facility" .needs to be defined. The intended <br />..meaning of the term "facility"in the proposed fee schedule is that each facility. type, e.g. <br />electric, water, or telecommunication facility; under a single provider's ownership and <br />installed under a single project/permit shall be considered a "facility" for .purposes of <br />calculating permit fees: In the example. given of two EWEB-owned electric conduits <br />installed in a joint trench, both conduits would be considered a single facility for purposes. <br />of permit fee assessment so long as both conduits were installed under the same project. <br />This definition will be included in the fee table; to clarify the meaning. <br />E. I find that the proposed increase in excavation permit fees and new right-of-way <br />cut permit fees for construction within. and use of the public way are consistent with applicable <br />policies and directives of the City Council, including policies developed through the Eugene <br />Decisions process, are based on the City's estimation of the costs associated-with providing. the <br />services, and are necessary in order ,to implement newly revised, provisions of the Eugene Code; <br />1971 and recover the cost from the beneficiaries of the services. `Administrative Order No. 58-96- <br />13-F should. be repealed, and-the Right-of=Way Use Permit Fee schedule attached. as Exhibit A <br />hereto adopted as amended herein. <br />On the basis of these findings, I order that: <br />1. Administrative Order No. 58-96-13-F is hereby repealed; as of midnight, June 30, <br />..1997. <br />2. The fees set forth in the Right-of ;Way Use Permit Fees.. schedule set forth in Exhibit <br />A :hereto are hereby established and/or ratified and affirmed as .the fees to be charged for the uses <br />set forth therein, as of 12:01 a.rn. on July 1,.1997. <br />Dated this ~ day of June, 1997. <br />i' , i~ <br />V'77 <br />/ ~. <br />'~~~ Vicki .Elmer <br />City Manager <br />Administrative Order - 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.