New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-97-19-F (2)
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-97-19-F (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 10:35:30 AM
Creation date
6/3/2009 8:13:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Industrial Pretreatment
Document_Date
10/27/1997
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Waste Hauler discharging wastes at a unpermitted discharge point (second <br />violation). The commenter questioned what happened following the first violation, <br />and why an irresponsible hauler would be given a second chance. <br />Finding: The penalty for the first incident of discharging at an unpermitted <br />discharge point. is raised from $500 to $1000 in the proposed changes to the <br />Enforcement Response Guide. Escalating or progressive enforcement is included <br />throughout the Enforcement Response Guide, and is a requirement in the federal <br />pretreatment regulations for preparation of enforcement plans. Allowing a hauler <br />a second .chance following a first violation is in accordance with this philosophy. <br />Following a second violation, a hauler's permit would be revoked, and discharge <br />privileges removed. <br />F. In addition to the specific findings set forth above, I find that the proposed <br />revisions are consistent with the directions of the City Council, and are necessary in order <br />to recover the City's costs associated with monitoring the City's industrial pretreatment <br />program and achieving compliance therewith by industrial users in accordance with the <br />Council's recent amendment of Section 2.018(5) of the Eugene Code, 1971 which <br />increased the maximum amount of civil penalty that may be imposed for violations of that <br />program. <br />On the basis of these findings, 1 order tha#: <br />1. Appendix A, Industrial Pretreatment Program Enforcement Response Guide <br />is .hereby amended as proposed, as reflected in the attachment hereto, which is <br />incorporated herein by reference. <br />2. The City Recorder is directed to replace the Appendix A attached to <br />Administrative Order No. 58-93-17 with a copy of the Appendix A attached hereto, and to <br />reflect this amendment thereon and in the City's records. <br />Dated and effective this ~ day of Oc ber, 1997. <br />Vicki Elmer <br />City Manager <br />Administrative Order - 6 ~oi22is7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.