New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-00-26-F (2)
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-00-26-F (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 9:05:27 AM
Creation date
6/2/2009 10:54:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Erosion
Document_Date
12/15/2000
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER N0.58-00-26-F <br />of the <br />City Manager of the City of Eugene <br />AMENDMENT OF EROSION PREVENTION AND <br />CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES <br />ADMINISTRATIVE RULE R-6.645 AND REPEAL OF <br />ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 58-96-26-F <br />The City Manager of the City of Eugene finds that: <br />A. Pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 2.019 and 6.645 of the Eugene Code, <br />1971, Erosion Prevention and Construction Site Management Practices Administrative Rule R-6.645 <br />was adopted on January 22, 1997 by Administrative Order No. 58-96-26-F establishing a program <br />for managing erosion and other negative water quality impacts associated with construction activities. <br />B. Based on the findings contained in Administrative Order No. 58-00-26 issued on <br />October 17, 2000 I proposed revisions to the rules to address issues that have arisen during <br />implementation of its provisions as more particularly set forth in Finding B of the order and in the <br />Notice of Intended Rulemaking. <br />C. Notice of the proposed amendments was published in the Register-Guard for five <br />consecutive days, to-wit, on October 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, 2000. The Notice was also made <br />available to persons who had requested such notice, and provided that written comments would be <br />received thereon for a period of 15 days from the first date of publication. No written comments <br />were received within the time and manner required by the notice, but during the comment period staff <br />recommended that the "Examples of `G' violations" set forth in R-6.645-I be deleted in order to <br />avoid potential confusion. as to their applicability. I .agree with the recommendation, and the examples. <br />have been deleted from the Rule. <br />Based upon the above findings, which are hereby adopted, and pursuant to the authority <br />contained in Sections 2.019 and 6.645 of the Eugene Code, 1971, I hereby repeal Administrative <br />Order No. 58-96-26-F as of the effective date of this order, amend Erosion Prevention and <br />Construction Site Management Practices Administrative Rule R-6.645 as proposed in Administrative <br />Order No. 58-00-26 and amended as noted in finding C above, and ratify the unamended portions of <br />Rule R-6.645 so it provides in full as follows: <br />EROSION PREVENTION AND CONSTRUCTION SITE <br />MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ADMINISTRATIVE RULER 6.645 <br />Administrative Rule - 1 <br />r:\adminoid\cules\OOerosprev2ao.wpd(12/07/00) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.