General Fund, the Six-Year Funded Program for New Capital Facilities shows only projects that were in either good or poor condition. The current level <br /> of funding is not closing the <br /> funded by Parks SDC's. The recently approved Parks and Open Space Bond provides funding deferred maintenance gap for General Fund facilities. <br /> for the following types of projects: <br /> The FCR process found not only a substantial deferred maintenance backlog, but that several <br /> 1. Open space acquisition, facilities, particularly recreation facilities, need substantial upgrades to meet current service <br /> 2. Park acquisition and development, which is also partially funded through Systems demands. Increases in building inventory over the next few years (public <br />safety stations, 911 <br /> Development Charges; center, new library) suggest that capital budget reinvestment in facilities will need to increase <br /> 3. Amazon Pool rehabilitation, and simply to accommodate these increases in square footage. Increased funding to meet these <br /> 4. Sport field construction and rehabilitation. needs would still not address the backlog of deferred maintenance. <br /> A listing of projects to be funded by the Parks and Open Space bond revenue will be .The $1.9 million capital General Fund budget is for the repair of <br />existing facilities and "catch <br /> included in an addendum to this CIP. These projects have originated from long-range master up" of deferred maintenance, and is allocated to Preservation and Maintenance <br />and Site and <br /> plans andlor City Council goals and policies, or have a high priority based on City operational Facility Improvements for each year of the program. Of the $1.9 million, <br /> $1.254 million is <br /> needs. dedicated tofacility-related capital preservation and maintenance projects.' <br /> It should be noted that the costs given for unfunded projects are only preliminary budget In 1998, the City Council dedicated $18 million of Urban Renewal <br /> funds to construct a new <br /> planning costs and are, for the most part, not based on detailed design cost estimates. library. Private contributions will be required to complete the <br />new facility based on <br /> community needs. In November, 1998, voters approved an operating levy for the new library <br /> Funding as well as funding for park acquisition and improvements to Amazon Pool. Funding has also <br /> „ been approved to construct a new 911 facility at 2"d and Chambers to alleviate overcrowding <br /> For the last several years, the City's General Fund has been the primary source of funding for and respond to seismic concerns at City Hall. <br /> Building and Park Facilities. 'Since General Fund revenues have not kept up with service and <br /> capital requirements, the Building and Park Facilities have been consistently underfunded. Nofe: The Draft CIP does not show any Community Development Block <br /> Grant (CDBG) <br /> funding for Fiscal Years 2000-2005. In the past, CDBG-funded projects have been in the <br /> In July 1994, the City Council adopted the current General Capital Budget strategy as part of Building and Park Facilities program, and typically included accessibility <br />improvements to City <br /> an overall General Fund revenue strategy. The strategy to fund building repair and facilities and park improvements in low-income neighborhoods. <br /> In 1995, afive-year <br /> reconstruction includes implementation of three approaches: Consolidated Plan was prepared for several local HUD-funded programs and was approved <br /> by the City Council. As part of that plan, every year a Orie-Year Action Plan for the use of <br /> 1. Budget $1 million in the Capital General Fund annually; CDBG funds is approved by the City Council. The current allocation for use of CDBG funds <br /> in Fiscal Year 1998-1999 was approved by the City Council in April 1998. Planning is <br /> <br /> 2. Dedicate up to $900,000 in end-of-year General Fund balances to facilities underway for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 and will be presented for City <br />Council approval in April <br /> maintenance; 1999. It is anticipated that future plans will allocate a portion of the projected approximately <br /> $1.5 million annual CDBG Federal grant to capital improvements. <br /> 3. Refer a series of general obligation bonds to voters to pay for major reconstruction or <br /> improvements to City facilities. <br /> In 1995, the City Council adopted a Facility Condition Report (FCR) process, which establishes <br /> baseline data about the condition of facilities supported by the General Fund through a <br /> <br /> detailed, structured inspection process. All capital building and facility projects in the <br /> <br /> General Fund are assessed and prioritized on the basis of this report. The 1997 FCR noted <br /> improvements in those facilities with moderate deficiencies, and little change in those facilities <br /> City of Eugene 2000.2005 Capital Improvement Program City of Eugene 2000.2005 Capital Improvement Program <br /> Project and Program Areas • Building and Park Facilities Project and Program Areas -.Building and Park Facilities <br /> 19 2p <br /> I <br /> <br />