_ _ <br /> - <br /> City of Eugene Legislative Policies for 2007 Oregon Legislative Session City of Eugene Legislative Policies for 2007 Oregon Legislative Session <br /> ~ Supportlocal discretion in standards forneeded housing. livability. It required cities and counties to adopt and maintain comprehensive plans, <br /> focusing urban development within UGBs and limiting rural development outside UGBs to <br /> C3. Twenty-Year Land Supply preserve Oregon's farm and forest land. <br /> HB 2709, which passed in the 1995 Legislative Session and is codified as ORS 197.296, <br /> requires cities to include enough residential land within their urban growth boundaries During the 1993 Legislative Session, the legislature adopted HB 3661, which <br /> revised and <br /> (UGBs) to meet residential needs for the next 20 years. Intended to reduce land prices by weakened the requirements for development on rural lands. <br /> increasing the amount of land available for housing, the bill required that projections of the <br /> 20-year need for residential land be based on the development that occurred since the last Subsequent legislative sessions have produced legislation to expand uses <br />allowed in rural <br /> periodic review or during the last five years, whichever is greater. This ignores changes in areas and to require LCDC to review its rules on developments in <br /> rural residential areas <br /> policy and land use code provisions to facilitate more compact development. The City near cities. <br /> supports the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) requirement fora <br /> 20-year buildable lands inventory, but continues to oppose the requirement that the Bills also have been introduced over the past decade to restructure the LCDC. <br /> Proposed <br /> housing needs analysis be based only on actual past development. changes included the shift from an appointed to an elected commission and the <br /> establishment of several regional commissions to replace the existing single commission. <br /> Since the passage of HB 2709, commercial realtors have argued for comparable The number of commissioners was increased from seven to eight by the 1993 Legislature, <br /> legislation for commercial and industrial land. HB 3557, which passed in the 2001 but the commission structure was not changed. <br /> Legislative Session, called for establishment of a working group to address issues related <br /> to the need for commercial and industrial land. Recommendations <br /> ~ Oppose7egislation that would weaken the statewide land use planning program or <br /> Recommendations the role orstructure of the Land Conservation and Development Commission. <br /> ~ Support legislation to amend ORS 197.296 to allow policy and land use code ~ Oppose proposals for intensification of use in rural areas outside city urban growth <br /> amendments to be considered in the determination of housing capacity and need. boundaries. <br /> ~ Oppose legislation that would establish a comparable requirement that the <br /> determination of commercial and industrial capacity and need must be based only C6. Preemptive Zoning and Supersiting <br /> on actual past development. During the past several legislative sessions, legislation has been introduced that would <br /> ~ Support legislation that would evaluate and account forrural residential preempt local zoning regulations and substitute statewide zoning regulation, or that would <br /> development's impact on housing capacity within the urban growth boundary. establish State supersiting authority. While it is the responsibility of the Legislature <br />to <br /> identify land use issues of statewide concern, local governments should have the flexibility <br /> C4. Annexation to implement State land use policy within the context of their acknowledged <br /> The Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan establishes an urban growth boundary and envisions comprehensive plans. State agency plans and decisions should be consistent with <br /> local: <br /> that all land within the urban growth boundary ultimately will be annexed to a city and acknowledged comprehensive plans and local planning processes. <br /> provided with the required urban services. Annexations to Eugene are processed by the <br /> Lane County Boundary Commission. In past legislative sessions, legislation has been Recommendation <br /> introduced to eliminate the Lane County Boundary Commission and to eliminate or ~ Opposelegislation thatestablishesstatutorypreemptivezoningorStatesupersiting <br /> weaken existing methods of annexation. authority. <br /> State law currently requires that withdrawals of annexed territory from special service C7. Condemnation Authority <br /> districts be processed by a city separately from Boundary Commission action on the focal governments' existing condemnation authority is a rarely used but important <br />tool that <br /> annexation request, necessitating a separate city hearing and action following Boundary is available to cities and urban renewal districts to help achieve public policy <br />goals relating <br /> Commission approval of an annexation. to transportation, housing, and economic development in particular. Limitation of this <br /> authority could result in increased costs to the City and make it more difficult to achieve <br /> Recommendations important public policy goals. <br /> ~ Oppose legislation that eliminates or weakens existing methods of annexation. <br /> ~ Support legislation to allow withdrawal of territory from special seNice districts. Recommendation <br /> ~ Oppose legislation thatrestricts cities'condemnation authority ormakes itmore <br /> difficult to use this authority to achieve public policygoals. <br /> C5. Oregon Land Use Planning Program and Land Conservation and Development <br /> Commission <br /> Senate Bill 100, enacted in 1973, established a statewide land use planning program to <br /> <br /> address concerns that rapid and uncoordinated development was threatening Oregon's <br /> 26 27 <br /> <br />