d. Innovative Approaches to Water Ouality Mana ement <br /> Significant future progress in solving the State's remaining water quality Over the next 10 years, for example, Oregon's Phase I cities and Corvallis will spend <br /> problems will require innovative solutions that go beyond the traditional more than $10 billion on measures to reduce storm water pollutants. While urban areas <br /> "command and control" permit approaches. Solutions such as watershed are a significant source of storm water pollutants, it is estimated that non-point sources <br /> management, pollution prevention, and pollution trading will require develo in are responsible for more than half of the pollutants. in water systems. However, <br /> partnerships and incentives to achieve effective improvements to water quality.g regulatory requirements focus almost exclusively on discharges from point source <br />and <br /> Strict liability and regulatory requirements currently do not allow the urban runoff. <br /> implementation of these flexible approaches. The City supports legislative and <br /> regulatory initiatives to facilitate development of new approaches to water If the objective is to remove pollutants from Oregon's waterways, then all sources of <br /> quality management, such as effluent trading and "green" permits. non-point source discharges need to assume an equitable share of responsibility. Local <br /> taxpayers should not be expected to continue funding water clean up while rural non- <br /> e• Water uali Standards point sources are exempt from responsibility. <br /> The City opposes any efforts to change State water quality standards through the Recommendations, <br /> legislative process. The DEQ has established a comprehensive process for <br /> evaluating current water quality standards and proposing new or changed 1• Support an increase in industrial wastewater fees and require DEQ to be <br /> standards which involves all stakeholders as well as recognized technical experts, accountable as to how the fees are being used by the agency. <br /> This process, followed by opportunities for the public to comment, has led to the 2. Support the use of state revolving funds for non-point sources and advocate <br />for <br /> Environmental Quality Commission adopting changes to several water quality <br /> standards. Future changes to water quality standards, including beneficial use increased funds for the State Revolving Loans Fund program. <br /> designations, should be obtained through a similar collaborative process, and not <br /> achieved through legislative action. 3. SALMON RECOVERY AND WATERSHED HEALTH <br /> 2• POLLUTION SOURCE EQUITY In March 1999, NOAA Fisheries listed the Upper Willamette Spring Chinook as a <br /> threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Upper Willamette <br /> Since Congressional passage of the Clean Water Act (CWA) in 1972, cities and Spring Chinook spends part of its life in the Willamette River, including areas within <br />the <br /> industries which discharge effluent from a "point source" have been under EPA City of Eugene. The protective rules for this species, known as Section 4(d) rules, <br /> jurisdiction. Authority to discharge from a point source (for example, a sewage treatment became effective on January 8, 2001, and prohibit any activity that harms <br />the listed fish <br /> plant) requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. or their habitat. Following legal challenges to ESA listing of various salmon populations <br /> around the Northwest, NOAA Fisheries reviewed salmon listings throughout the region, <br /> Although this focus on point sources has significantly improved the nation's water including the Upper Willamette Spring Chinook. NOAA Fisheries has recently proposed <br /> quality, substantial water pollution continues to result from unregulated "non-point" to maintain the listing of the Upper Willamette Spring Chinook as threatened. <br /> sources (i.e., water pollutants with diffuse origins). In its re-authorization of the CWA in <br /> 1987, Congress addressed part of this problem by requiring cities and certain industries to On April 10, 2000 the Eugene City Council adopted a resolution directing <br />the City to <br /> treat storm water run-off through a series of "best practices." The 19871anguage called support recovery of upper Willamette Spring Chinook through an integrated, City-wide <br /> for implementation in two phases based on city population. Phase I called for cities with effort. The resolution directs the City to work in partnership with local, <br />state and federal <br /> a population of 100,000 or more to obtain NPDES Storm water permits. By 1995, all agencies to develop regional recovery plans. <br /> Phase I communities in Oregon had received their NPDES permit. The EPA is now <br /> moving into Phase II, which requires all cities with a population exceeding 50,000 to Recommendations; <br /> obtain a stormwater permits. The agency has also authorized Oregon's DEQ to extend <br /> the requirement to any city it deems appropriate. 1. The City supports efforts to preserve the ability of local governments to pursue <br /> recovery of salmon populations through a mix of regulatory compliance, <br /> Officials from Oregon cities have acknowledged their responsibility for maintaining and restoration projects, community outreach and involvement. <br /> improving water quality and have developed measures to reduce discharges from city <br /> facilities. 2. State and federal salmon recovery efforts should be responsive to and <br /> coordinated with locally adopted and developed recovery plans. <br /> <br /> City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session 46 <br /> City of Eugene Legisiative Policies, 2005 Session 47 <br /> <br />