New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Legislative Policies for the 2005 Legislative Session
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Legislative Policies for the 2005 Legislative Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 12:20:17 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:32:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Legislative Policies
Document_Date
1/31/2005
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> j <br /> The Consolidated Plan lists hr <br /> t ee top pr~or~ty acttvrties: a) mcreasmg the rental supply of 3. HOUSING IMPACT STATEMENT <br /> permanent affordable housing; b) enhancing shelter support services for homeless households; <br /> and c) increasing the supply of transitional and permanent housing for specialized populations. I The City of Eugene will oppose legislation to impose a requirement <br />that local <br /> I governments prepare a housing impact statement for municipal land use ordinances. The <br /> The cities of Eugene and Springfield and Lane County address ]ow-income housing needs ~ land use laws require that all statewide goals be addressed when developing <br />rules and <br /> through an intergovernmental Housing Policy Board whose primary focus is to develop additional ordinances. Requiring impact statements creates unnecessary bureaucratic <br />delay and <br /> housing for very-low-income families. The City also supports broadening the eligibility gives priority to housing over other land use goals. <br /> requirements for housing assistance so that families between 40 and 80 percent of the area's <br /> median income will be able to qualify for some assistance. In Lane County, the median income ~ Eugene is committed to investigating barriers to affordable housing <br />and to recommending <br /> for a family of three is $48,900; 80 percent of the median income is $39,100 (low-income); and ' ways to mitigate or remove City ordinances or policies that add <br />to the cost of housing. <br /> 50 percent of median is $24,450 (very-low-income). More than 25 percent of Eugene's 58,000 ~ The City has taken steps to remove many of these barriers, including <br />expanding the <br /> <br /> ~ households are very low-income. When combined with Springfield, over 20,000 households ~ supply of vacant land zoned for medium-density housing, expanding the <br />use of <br /> have incomes at or below 50 percent of the area median. manufactured homes and reducing parking requirements for low-income and senior <br /> housing. <br /> 1. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND SUPORT PROGRAMS 4. EXTEND MUPTE AND TRANSIT SUPPORTED TAX EXEMPTIONS <br /> The Housing Trust Fund, created by statute in 1991, was one of Oregon's more successful Extend legislative authorization for the New Multiple Unit Property Tax <br /> programs to increase the supply of affordable housing. The trust fund supported Exemption program and the Transit Supportive Residential and Mixed Use tax exemption <br /> programs ranging from the development of affordable housing to home ownership program. <br /> assistance and an Emergency Housing Account. Oregon Housing & Community <br /> Services (OHCS), along with affordable housing advocates, needs additional funding for <br /> affordable housing development through the trust fund, and for emergency housing and <br /> rental assistance. This would allow the Department to both increase the level of its C. LAND USE PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT <br /> current services, as well as make additional investments in social service programs to <br /> support those who cannot afford .unsubsidized housing. The City supports the continued 1. BALLOT MEASURE 37 l NST COMPENSATION <br /> funding of the Housing Trust Fund (HTF). Particular sub-goals include: <br /> a) Support a funding goal of $50 million per biennium On November 2, 2004, Measure 37 was passed by the Oregon voters, requiring <br /> b) Expansion of the Elderly Rental Assistance (ERA) program to include more governments to "pay owners, or forego enforcement when certain land restrictions reduce <br /> low-income households property value." <br /> c) Renew the Oregon Affordable Housing Tax Credit for lenders <br /> The City of Eugene has had a legislative policy on just compensation for over a decade. <br /> 2. REMOVAL OF REGULATORY BARRIERS TO LOW-INCOME HOUSING The City has always supported -and continues to support -the constitutional <br /> requirement that property owners who have been deprived of all reasonable economic use <br /> The City of Eugene supports local efforts to make the siting, financing or development of of their property by government action should be compensated. The City <br />has opposed <br /> low-income and affordable housing easier by streamlining systems, rules, codes and laws legislation and ballot measures that would require compensation if a land <br />use decision <br /> that present regulatory barriers to that housing. The City will support State legislation ' deprives a property owner of only some, but not all or nearly all, <br />reasonable economic <br /> that. encourages the development of low-income and affordable housing while use of the property. The City's opposition has been based on the importance of <br /> considering the interests of cities and their citizens. The City will support repeal of ORS regulations in implementing comprehensive planning and other policy <br />decisions of the <br /> 197.309 which prohibits local jurisdictions from requiring affordable housing as a council and on the innumerable benefits of these regulations in providing <br />certainty and <br /> condition of development approval ("inclusionary zoning"). The city also supports protection for property owners, developers and neighbors. While some argue <br />that the <br /> efforts to prohibit insurance companies from either denying insurance coverage to most basic land use regulations are "takings," others argue that they are "givings" <br />and <br /> housing because it has public financing or increasing its premiums for such coverage. that the emphasis on reduction in value is both one-sided and short-sighted, <br /> City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session 27 City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session 28 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.