New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Legislative Policies for the 2005 Legislative Session
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Legislative Policies for the 2005 Legislative Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 12:20:17 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:32:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Legislative Policies
Document_Date
1/31/2005
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
opportunities to tailor enterprise zone proposals in a way consistent with important and <br /> specific city goals and values. <br /> 4. DIVISION OF STATE LANDS <br /> Recom--- <br /> meson. <br /> The City of Eugene participated in the creation of the West Eugene Wetlands Plan which <br /> 1 • Support efforts to allow additional local flexibility to enterprise zone criteria for has become a national model for addressing Federal requirements to preserve <br />wetland <br /> qualifying businesses. habitats. Programs administered by the Division of State Lands that support the <br /> successful administration of this plan include the Wetland Conservation Planning <br /> D• STATE BUDGET Program, technical assistance on wetlands regulatory issues, the wetland mitigation <br /> banking program, coordination with and representation in Federal wetlands policy <br /> • processes and wetlands determinations for nonprofit development proposals. <br /> Measure 50 impaired the City's ability to provide necessary services to its citizens. The City <br /> understands the constraints on the State's General Fund budget, but will oppose cuts in State 5. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY <br /> agencies that would impose substantial burdens on local government or require them to assume <br /> services cut by the State. In Eugene-Sprin tell - There are many examples where sufficient funding for Department of Environmental <br /> Oregon - is the largest employer, the community's dependence on the State's fin nctaelrstty of Quality (DEQ) programs significantly benefits local governments. These <br />include <br /> structure <br /> and viability is profound. Local governments are more intricately associated with the State groundwater protection, toxic use and hazardous waste reduction, solid waste <br />reduction, <br /> taxation and budgeting structure than is commonly realized. For example, the State's inability to spill-response programs, the state superfund program to clean up sites <br />contaminated by <br /> provide adequate funding for human services has had a direct impact on cities, because the commercial or industrial use of hazardous materials, household hazardous waste <br /> demand for services did not disappear, collection, market development for recycled products, other toxic site cleanup and the <br /> sewer safety net. Adequate funding for DEQ to carry out its water quality programs is <br /> 1 • DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION extremely important for local governments. ' <br /> The City deeply appreciates the investments the citizens of Oregon have made t 6. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES <br /> the Legislature, in facilities and programs at the University of Oregon. These ~ hrough <br /> investments have allowed the University to return numerous dividends to the State Further reductions in services to at-risk youth, families, the homeless, unemployed <br /> through education, research and public service. The City encourages increas persons and persons with mental disabilities can create situations requiring police <br /> investment in higher cducation. response. Cuts in these areas also would reduce referral opportunities, resulting in <br /> reduced ability to resolve problems outside the criminal justice system. <br /> 2• DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT <br /> The City of Eugene is opposed to State service reductions that will remove key survival <br /> <br /> ' The City supports the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DECD) services to persons unable to obtain those services elsewhere. Such reductions not <br />only <br /> budget for the coming biennium, with special emphasis on providing continued fundin are a direct threat to the health and welfare of thousands of Oregonians, but <br />also present <br /> of the DECD-ODOT Transportation and Growth Management Grant Pro ram full g the potential for additional burdens to local social service programs. <br /> funding of local planning grants and an increased level of technical assistance an <br /> data/research capacity within the agency. d 7. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES <br /> 3 • STATE LIBRARY The City strongly supports continued State funding for low-income housing programs, <br /> including the Oregon Housing Fund, grants to community development corporations and <br /> The City will support legislation to continue funding for the Library Link program. This funding for emergency housing services. The Emergency Housing Account has <br /> frees up Federal funds for local library development and meets the purposes of Federal supported programs such as the shelter at Centro LatinoAmericanoond the Interfaith <br /> law. The City supports State reimbursement of local libraries that lend to other libraries Emergency Shelter Program. The account is mostly depleted and needs <br />to be <br /> more materials than they borrow, and continuation of a formula distribution of State aid replenished• <br /> to public libraries. The amount allocated is very small ($1.00 per child through age 14), <br /> but assists in providing some library services targeted to children. <br /> City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session <br /> 16 <br /> City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.