New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Legislative Policies for the 2005 Legislative Session
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Legislative Policies for the 2005 Legislative Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 12:20:17 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:32:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Legislative Policies
Document_Date
1/31/2005
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would result in compression where compression does not exist under current law would up-to-date, additional revenue loss could occur. <br /> result in a reduced ability by the City to fund highly desired projects. <br /> The counties have taken the position that they need help with funding of the A&T <br /> On December 20, 2001, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled on a tax appeal filed by Shilo function. Assessors say that declining county revenues have resulted in fewer staff, <br /> Inns against Multnomah County, the City of Portland the Portland Development particularly appraisers. They have sought a stable funding source for A&T activities, <br />and <br /> Commission, and State Department of Revenue. The court decided that all urban renewal in particular; have proposed that cities, schools and special districts share <br />in the cost of <br /> division of tax revenues, including those revenues generated by school levies and GO property tax administration. <br /> bond levies, are subject to the Measure S limit of $l 0 per thousand of real market value <br /> for general government taxes. This increases the possibility that cities will experience tax In addition, appeals of assessed property value may result in loss of taxable <br />value within <br /> compression resulting in loss of revenue. <br /> the city and subsequent loss of tax revenue. This is of particular concern for the City of <br /> ` Eugene and other cities which have a substantial portion of their taxable valuation <br /> The City opposes any proposed legislation that would result in a further potential loss of ~ provided byhigh-technology facilities which may be subject to extreme <br />swings in <br /> revenue to local taxing jurisdictions, unless the State fully reimburses the local assessed value. Unexpected reductions of assessed values in such cases can have <br /> government. <br /> damaging effect on local services. In order to anticipate changes in taxable valuation, <br /> Recommendations: cities should be notified of appeals of assessed value for non-residential property. <br /> Recommendations: <br /> 1 • Oppose any legislation that reduces revenue to cities without full reimbursement <br /> from~the State. <br /> 1. Support statewide standards for assessment and taxation services to ensure that <br /> assessment records are correct and up-to-date, and thus can be used to provide <br /> 2. Oppose any legislation regarding urban renewal that affects maximum revenue accurate calculations of property tax revenue. <br /> collection authority granted to urban renewal agencies under Measure 50 that <br /> would cause compression where compression does not exist under current law or 2. Support stable and dedicated sources of statewide funding for assessment and <br /> that requires any retroactive reimbursement of tax revenue already collected. taxation activities. <br /> 4. ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION APPEALS, FUNDING AND STANDARDS 3. Oppose any shift to cities for funding of county assessment and taxation activities <br /> Although the assessment and unless an additional source of revenue is identified. <br /> taxation (A&T) function is Assessment and Taxation Funding 4. Support a requirement that cities be notified of appeals of assessed value for non- <br /> carried out at the county level, residential property. Cities should be given a formal opportunity to comment on <br /> the results are important to ¦Support statewide standards for assessment the record. <br /> cities, particularly in a post- and taxation services to ensure that assessment <br /> Measure 50 environment. Cities records are correct and up-to-date, and thus can <br /> have always relied on county tax be used to provide accurate calculations of C. OTHER LOCAL BUDGET CONCERNS <br /> collections for city property property tax revenue. <br /> taxes; now they must rely on the 1. STATE-SHARED REVENUE <br /> completeness and accuracy of ¦Support stable and dedicated sources of _ <br /> the assessment process to ensure statewide funding for assessment and taxation <br /> that they receive the full amount activities. The provision of police, fire, planning, zoning and other services make the City eligible <br /> of property taxes due. If, for to receive these funds from the State. The City receives approximately $2.5 million each <br /> example, the county assessor ¦Oppose a shift to the cities for funding of fiscal year in state shared revenue. This money is placed in the City's General Fund and <br /> does not add new properties to county assessment and taxation activities is used to provide essential services, such as police and fire. <br /> the rolls, does not adjust unless an additional source ofrevenue is <br /> assessments for major identified. <br /> improvements or if the market <br /> value of properties are not kept ¦Support a requirement that cities be notified <br /> <br /> City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session l2 <br /> City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.