Funding Outlook <br /> The Road Fund provides no funding in this CIP for capital needs over the next six years. This <br /> ~ reflects Lane County's planned reductions in the County/City Road Partnership Agreement, no <br /> increase in the state gas tax for the past 12 years, and the ongoing needs for road system <br /> operations and maintenance in the Public Works Department's operating budget. For the <br /> :I <br /> ~ Transportation System Development Charge Fund, revenues from system development charges <br /> ! ` fluctuate based on annual development activity. <br /> In October 2001, the Citizen's Subcommittee on Transportation System Funding presented its <br /> recommendation that the council implement a transportation funding package consisting of a <br /> combination local motor vehicle fuel tax and transportation system maintenance fee for the <br /> purpose of generating an additional $9 million annually to address the City's critical <br /> transportation system funding needs. As a result of that recommendation, on January 29, 2003, a <br /> , local motor vehicle fuel tax ("fuel tax"), was approved by council at the 3-cent level, which is <br /> currently generating over $2 million per year. In January 2005, the City council adopted an <br /> ordinance increasing that local motor vehicle fuel tax from the initial $0.03 per gallon to $0.05 <br /> per gallon through February of 2008, an action which is expected to generate an additional $1.45 <br /> ~J ~ million for pavement preservation in FY06. <br /> ~ Also in keeping with the Citizen Subcommittee recommendation, on December 9, 2002, the <br /> council approved an ordinance establishing a transportation system maintenance fee (TSMF). <br /> On September 8, 2003, the council voted to repeal the TSMF ordinance, citing the repeal by <br /> Springfield City Council of that city's TSMF and concerns about equity between the two cities, <br /> ' as well as concerns raised by the Eugene Chamber of Commerce about the structure and impact <br /> of the TSMF on Eugene businesses. Council also cited continued hope for collaborative <br /> solutions with partner agencies. <br /> As a result of discussions with those interagency partners, Lane County has chosen not to <br /> ~ explore either acounty-wide motor vehicle registration fee or a county-wide motor vehicle fuel <br /> tax. However, in May 2004 the Board of County Commissioners authorized the transfer of all of <br /> Lane County's road operations, maintenance and preservation allocation from the 2003 Oregon <br /> Transportation Investment Act (OTIA III) to the cities of Lane County for up to three years, and <br /> the City of Eugene will receive approximately $500,000 in FY06 from the County under this <br /> agreement. Together with the reimbursement component for the transportation SDC approved <br /> by council in FY02, these revenue sources are projected to generate $4.47 million for the <br /> pavement preservation program in FY06. In addition to the pavement preservation funding, <br /> ` $388,000 in federal monies and $97,000 in local matching monies is dedicated to bike path <br /> - preservation and maintenance--for a total of nearly $5.0 million in transportation system <br /> preservation and maintenance projects in the FY06 Capital Budget. <br /> l When the Budget Subcommittee on Transportation Funding presented their report to council in <br /> late 2001, the City was facing an estimated $67 million backlog in pavement preservation work, <br /> as confirmed by an independent consultant. The backlog has since grown to a current level of <br /> nearly $94 million. While the revenue level discussed above is still short of the target identified <br /> by the Citizen Subcommittee, it will allow the city to slow, and even begin to reverse, the <br /> alarming growth trend in the pavement preservation backlog. <br /> City of Eugene 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program <br /> <br /> ' i~.~ 129 <br /> _ _ <br /> <br />