New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2005 MWMC Financial Plan
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission
>
2005
>
2005 MWMC Financial Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2009 12:51:56 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:28:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Wastewater
PWA_Project_Area
MWMC
PW_Subject
Financial Plan
Document_Date
2/27/2006
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX I <br />CREDIT WORTHINESS IN THE U.S. PUBLIC WASTEWATER SECTOR <br />Background <br />The wastewater utility industry in the United States is very capital intensive. In addition to <br />adding capacity necessary to accommodate population growth, sewer utilities must also reinvest <br />in capital assets to extend the life of the facilities, and to maintain compliance with <br />environmental and other regulatory requirements. Even the smallest wastewater utilities must <br />spend millions to preserve, upgrade and expand their plant facilities. <br />In order to meet new and ongoing capital needs, it is essential for the wastewater utility industry <br />to have access to capital financing markets. <br />In the 1970s and 1980s, Federal grants were available to build and upgrade facilities. For <br />example, MWMC was awarded more than $80 million in Federal grants to construct the <br />Eugene/Springfield wastewater facilities. In the years since, a significant portion of the <br />wastewater industry's capital needs have been met using current revenues (also known as pay-as- <br />you-go). However, recent data indicates bond financing is used extensively and may be <br />growing. Ina 1999 study, Moody's Investor Services reported that the median debt-to-fixed- <br />assets ratio was roughly 33 percent. Simply put, the median wastewater utility had one third of <br />all its assets carried as bonded debt. Other national gauges indicate that more than one half of <br />new capital investment in the industry is funded through bond financing. <br />Demonstrating and maintaining credit worthiness in the eyes of the capital financing markets is <br />critical to obtaining bond financing at the lowest possible interest rate. Establishing policies, <br />practices and other terms of operation that confirm and enhance credit worthiness should be a <br />primary goal of the MWMC Financial Plan, and guide the management of the utility. <br />Measuring Credit Quality <br />While capital debt may be structured in numerous ways, revenue bonds and general obligation <br />bonds are the most common instruments used by the public sewer industry in the United States. <br />For example, MWMC matched the Federal grant funds with $29.5 million in general obligation <br />bonds to fully finance construction of the regional wastewater facilities. <br />When assessing the credit quality of a wastewater utility, there are numerous financial measures <br />and other factors that are evaluated by the capital market. Public sewer utilities are generally <br />viewed favorably by bond rating agencies and creditors, because they tend to be very stable with <br />minimal risk of default. They are highly regulated, essential to the public good, and often <br />operate with a natural monopoly. The regulatory bodies for wastewater utilities typically have <br />the authority to establish user fees and charges necessary to cover debt obligations. <br />The industry, as a whole, has an extremely good credit history. However, individual wastewater <br />utilities are still subject to close scrutiny when requesting large issues of capital debt. When <br />assessing the credit quality of a wastewater utility, a bond rating agency will generally examine <br />several specific areas, including: <br />• Financial ratios and other indicators of fiscal health, <br />2005 MWMC Financial Plan - Appendix I Page 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.