<br /> <br />Page 60 <br />Section I: TBC~tIC~u. SBaaviCES <br />mote terminal units, CRT display/keyboard inter- <br />faces,alarm/eventandlogprinter, lineprinter,and <br />storage drive module. The computer and three <br />CRT display/keyboards were located in the Ad- <br />ministration Building. <br />PERFORMANCE HISTORY <br />OF CENTRALIZED PROCESS <br />COMPUTER <br />The original purpose of the plantprocess computer <br />was to provide automated control and data logging <br />capabilities that would minimize the number of <br />staff required. But the computer proved to be <br />unreliable, inefficient, and expensive to maintain. <br />Its two biggest problems were limited memory and <br />heavy maintenance requirements. <br />• Maintenance <br />Maintenance of the old <br />centralized computer sys- <br />temwas difficult andcostly. <br />Due to the rapid changes in <br />computer technology in the <br />1980s and the delay be- <br />tween computer installa- <br />tion and plant start-up, the <br />original computer system <br />was outdated from the day <br />it was put into operation. <br />Many parts and compo- <br />nentswere nolonger manu- <br />factured, and because the <br />computer had no diagnos- <br />tic program, troubleshoot- <br />ingwas very time consum- <br />ing. <br />Failure of some key componenr~ of the system <br />could easily result in partial or complete failure for <br />an indefinite period. Due to the system's complex- <br />ity, maintenance had to be done by contract with <br />the manufacturer's representative. The mainte- <br />nance contract was expensive, and service was <br />slow because there was only one contractor in the <br />area qualified to work on the system. <br />PLANT COMPUTER SYSTEM <br />The existing centralized process control system <br />had so many deficiencies and problems that staff <br />decided a new control system should be installed. <br />A team of plant staff developed the specifications <br />for the new system. <br />The team ultimately selected a distributed system <br />design, which divides the processing power into <br />various sections in the plant. Each section is ca- <br />pable of operatingindependently,butisconnected <br />by a "Data Highway° -similar to a LAN. The <br />Data Highway is a dual redundant configuration <br />thatprovides virtually 100 percentreliabiliry. The <br />distributed control system (DCS) has operator <br />consoles (windows into the control system) in <br />nearly all process areas, as well as in the mainte- <br />nance shop and operations building. It also is <br />connected to off-site pumping stations by both <br />telephone and microwave telemetry systems. An <br />operator can check or change any process variable <br />in any part of the plant from any one of the <br />consoles. Information on alarms and operating <br />conditions also is available from anyplant operator <br />console. <br />Plant personnel installed the control system and a <br />MicroVAX mini-computer system in several <br />phases. Phase 1 documented the wiring, functions, <br />and configuration of the hardware and software of <br />the existing control system. The second phase was <br />two-fold: developing configurations for the new <br />system and preparing the signal, power, data, and <br />wiring to ensure a quick transfer to the new system. <br />The third phase was the actual installation of the <br />DCS equipment and the changeover to the DCS. <br />Each plant process was converted and debugged <br />before moving on to the next step. During the <br />fourth and final phase, the auxiliary equipment <br />was brought on-line, and testing of the system <br />started. <br />Are electrician installs components in the <br />distributed control system. <br />