New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Record of Decision New Federal Courthouse
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Record of Decision New Federal Courthouse
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 8:48:05 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:27:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Courthouse
Document_Date
3/31/2001
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Record of Decision Attachment C -Agency Comment and Responses <br />Council Memo <br />January 8, 2001 _ <br />Page 11 <br />determine the preferred environmental-site. <br />SuaaestedRemedies to the Situation -. - - <br />In order to fully evaluate critically all of-the current: final <br />alternatives, and insure the- public's, as_-well as other . <br />governmental entities'y .comments are adequately ,received and. <br />'.evaluatedtheGSAlshould do the following:. _ : <br />1. Delayita January. 18,.2001 date for a Record of Decision on '- <br />the:courthouae project. <br />2.- Obpain as quickly ae possible a phase I environmental <br />assessment on the AutoCraft property sad include that information <br />in a.aupplemental NBPA document-,-available for public: comment.-'.. <br />3. CanflucC or .include, if done; the full comparative analyaia _ .. <br />between the: Alternative i and Alternative 2 sites and include such <br />'detailed analyeis?ia_the supplemental NBPAldocument. <br />4. After qhe complete' information is known and critically <br />:evaluated>: then make the preferred alternative daciaioa on'tha' <br />preferred environmental courthouse site. <br />5. include in the 8IS a full diacnsaion of how any'aite near <br />the railroad tracks meets the standards. set out in the 17~~;gQ. <br />States Courts Deaian Guide -when other sites furtherlfrom the <br />railroad: tracks. have. been fouhd'unacceptable. <br />Thank you-for your consideratiaa:of this information. <br />JJLalk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.