New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Courthouse District Draft Concept Plan
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Courthouse District Draft Concept Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 11:02:06 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:26:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Courthouse
Document_Date
7/17/2002
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Appendix B: Summery Description of Transportation Alternatives <br />In developing the Courthouse District Concept Plan, project staff and consultants developed and <br />evaluated numerous transportation alternatives. All of the alternatives addressed the four main urban <br />design goals, with an emphasis on creating connections between the downtown, the courthouse area <br />and the river. However, each alternative balanced these goals differently, specifically in the trade-off <br />between providing an intersection at 8t" and Mill and relocating some of the traffic currently flowing <br />through the area. <br />At the January 16, 2002 City Council Work Session, staff presented three transportation alternatives, <br />including Low Build, Fifth Street Connection (Local Street Option), and 6th/7th Realignment (the <br />"swoop"). In March, in response to the Downtown Plan Update Committee's comments, staff and <br />consultants developed a fourth alternative, 6th Avenue Realignment. In April, Jerry Diethelm, a profes- <br />sor of Landscape Architecture at the University of Oregon proposed a fifth alternative, 8th Avenue / <br />Broadway Concept. These five alternatives were evaluated against the following performance mea- <br />sures: <br />Traffic Accommodation <br />8th and Mill intersection operation <br />Corridor operation for Highway 99 travel <br />Transit <br />Accessibility <br />2. Pedestrian Environment <br />Stn and Mill crossing <br />8th Avenue pedestrian experience <br />riverfront access <br />Broadway corridor <br />3. Urban Design Issues <br />Millrace connection to river <br />urban arena accommodation <br />redevelopment potential <br />4. Cost and Feasibility <br />Available land <br />required partnerships <br />potential cost <br />Based on this evaluation, staff to the project ranked the alternatives in the following order: <br />6th Avenue Realignment <br />2. 6th /7th Realignment (Swoop) <br />3. Fifth Street Connection (Local Street Option) <br />4. 8th Avenue/Broadway Concept <br />5. Low Build Option <br />After extensive discussion, the Downtown Plan Update Committee voted to recommend the 6th <br />Avenue Realignment as the preferred alternative. A diagram and evaluation of each of these five <br />alternatives can be found in the materials presented to the Downtown Plan Update Committee on June <br />3, 2002, included as Attachment C-4 to the Agenda Item Summary for the City Council Work Session <br />on July 17, 2002. <br />Page 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.