Biological Resources <br />Fenders blue butterfly is one of about a dozen subspecies of Boisduval's blue butterfly. Recent <br />surveys indicate that the butterfly is confined to 32 prairie sites in the Willamette Valley. The ~ l <br />majority of these sites are dry upland prairies characterized by Festuca species. ' Kincaid's lupine <br />almost always serves as the sole source of oviposition sites and larval food for these butterflies. <br />Because neither dry upland prairies nor Kincaid's lupine occur at any of the alternative sites, <br />Fenders blue butterfly is not expected to be affected by courthouse construction'activities. <br />Significant Adverse Impacts <br />Impacts Common to Alternatives 1 and 2 <br />The following analysis addresses the potential impacts from the lazger site option for both <br />Alternatives 1 and 2 (i.e., site option A in each case). The impacts would not be significantly <br />different for the smaller site option (i.e., option B in each case). - <br />Loss of landscaped areas on any of the alternative sites would have minimal impact upon <br />wildlife present, which consists predominantly of small mammals and birds adapted to urban <br />habitats. Construction of the proposed courthouse facility would require land clearing and <br />removal of some landscape trees on the majority of the alternative sites under consideration. <br />Preliminary siting studies have been initiated for each of the alternative sites to enable <br />assessment of these impacts. The sketches shown in Figure 6 provide preliminary estimates of <br />the size and placement of the courthouse building footprint at each of the alternative sites. Based <br />on those general estimates, the tree removal requirements at each of the sites aze described <br />below. <br />Fish habitat for threatened and endangered species occurring in azeas downstream of the <br />alternative project sites may be affected during construction and long-term operation of the <br />proposed courthouse facility. The potential impacts aze common to both alternative sites, <br />although the degree of impact is dependent on the proximity of the building site to a water body, <br />as well as the design of stormwater collection and treatment facilities. Construction impacts can <br />result from stormwater runoff carrying sediment and nutrients, and from accidental chemical <br />spills. Long-term impacts on fish involve changes in the amount of impervious surface azea and <br />water quality degradation. <br />Stormwater runoff during construction may transport sediment, nutrients, and pollutants into <br />water bodies, thereby affecting fish habitat. Excessive sediments can harm fish by clogging <br />spawning gravels, reducing benthic invertebrate populations, and filling in pools used as juvenile <br />reazing habitat. Excessive nutrient loading can harm fish by causing algal blooms that reduce <br />dissolved oxygen levels and by reducing the diversity of benthic invertebrate populations. <br />Accidental spills of pollutants (fuel, oil, chemicals, and concrete leachate) during construction <br />may harm fish in the immediate azea, although the impact is dependent on the effectiveness of <br />containment and cleanup procedures. <br />~_ <br />Final EIS 58 New Federal Courthouse <br />,__, <br />