New Search
Comments and Responses, September 27, 2000 Public Hearing in Springfield <br />T3O John Briggs <br />T30.1-Comment acknowledged. <br />T31 Steve Moe <br />731.1-Comment acknowledged. <br />732 Robert Montgomery <br />732.1-Potential traffic impacts at <br />the Chiquita (formerly Agripac) <br />site are assessed in the <br />transportation section of the draft <br />EIS and the accompanying Traffic <br />Impact Analysis (Appendix B). <br />The issue of locating the facility <br />near the railroad tracks is addressed <br />Transcript 2 <br />48 <br /> 1 Lhe atl~aconL proDertiea on the corner of -- <br /> 2 MR. MEERBCHEIDT: Sorry. Pl4a4o atat4 your nnmo. <br />T30.1 3 MS. BRIGGS: Oh. Briggs. John Brigfls, B-R-I-0-G-8. <br /> 4 And we own tho nd,~ac4nt proportt4a on Lhe cornor of C end <br /> 6 Motor. And wa would like to Juat think that Lhe riv4r front <br /> 8 pro,iect site number 1 is ~uaL oarfoct for us. And w4're <br /> 7 looking forward to you being Lhere. That's alt. <br /> 8 MR. MEERSCHEIDT: Thank you. Ie there anyone etas <br /> 9 who NOUN 11 k4 CO apoak tonlflh L? Y4a, air. <br /> 10 MR. MOE: I always wait until last 6ecauee 4v4rybpdy <br /> 1i has made their point. My name ie Stove Moo. M-O-E. I <br /> 12 Lestifted at the feat Limo you wor4 Hero in support of option <br /> 13 1. <br />731.1 11 I've look4d at the EIS report. I a4o nothing to <br /> 1 <br />1a chang4 that. And I'm harp to g1v4 ny oupport to Lhat Option <br /> 18 and hope thnt you come to Sprfnflfield. Thank you. <br /> 11 MR. MEER8CHEIDT: Thank you. Ie Lhere anyone 41se <br /> i8 who would like to apoak tonight? Y4s. <br /> 19 MR. MONTGOMERY: Robert MOntgonery. I live ho re in <br /> 20 Springfi4ld. I'm 3ust a retired bus driver xho worked for 22 <br /> 21 years at ITD. <br />132.1 22 I Lhtnk your spot at Agripac end the pertici- <br /> 23 pnting areas tnaL you have, one, how to the foot traffic going <br /> 24 to qeL beck and forth throuflh these areas when you ere next Lo <br /> 25 the reilroatl. you're next Lo two buoy intereections, Olua the <br />in the safety and security section of the draft EIS. <br />Neither of these analyses concludes that developing <br />the Chiquita site would result in any significant <br />adverse environmental impact. <br />New Federal Courthouse 277. Final EIS <br />