New Search
Comments and Responses, September 27, 2000 Public Hearing in Springfield <br />T28.2-The traffic analysis <br />contained in the draft EIS does not <br />conclude that project-related <br />traffic would be a significant <br />concern for any of the <br />alternatives. <br />T28.3-Comments <br />acknowledged. <br />Transerlpt 2 <br />39 <br />T28.i i commUntty. that uses this courthouse whleh 1s boyond Lhe <br />Conti.) 2 Eugene/Springfieltl caMmunlty. <br />1282 3 We have ncceas on 120, you have accecs off ofi <br />a 30th, and You have access through Glenwood. All relaLlvalY <br />6 rapid access. i don't know if you've aver gotten fn your car, <br />e put a 1lttle atop watch on 1t. but I think you'll find the <br />7 acceaalbility to this alto is ,lust as good, if not batter, than <br />B the downtown site thnt you're conatdaring 1n Eugarro or Lhe alto <br />9 that you're conaldering ndJncant to the Ferry Street Bridge <br />10 area and the trnfftc on tFw Ferrr 8traet Bridge. <br />11 I'm not going to go into each of the criteria <br />12 beyontl that. because I think that brobebly you cnn meke a case <br />13 for either of the altos in terms of the criterin. pluaua and <br />14 minunua to oath one. I think the bottom lino when you got to <br />15 the and, they'ro probably going to be fairly equal. <br />~~ 16 8o I'd like Lo talk shout throe crtwrta again <br />17 that I think mnyw tent era not listed that I think is <br />18 Important. <br />19 Gtaarly the interoat of Eugeno 1n Lh1a in <br />20 retaining a courthouse to airoly that. rotaining the <br />21 courthouse. And I submit Lo you that that is a different <br />22 interest than renting the courthouse. <br />23 I think we -- when you rent through your first <br />24 ctope over there, tFw site you 1M t1nl1Y pickoa in Eugono, <br />2b there xne n tot of discuaston there. Followed it in tno nova <br />Final EIS 268 New Federal Courthouse <br />