Comments and Responses, September 27, 2000 Public Hearing in Springfield <br />T17.9-Comment acknowledged. <br />Transcript 2 <br />19 <br />T17.8 1 And while It's true that the scale of the <br />coati. 2 courthouse i• larger than existing buildings ;in the iwnediatc <br />a area. Lha moat iwporLant way to change PaOP10'a thinking about <br />4 downtown Springflold is by conveying its poseibiiities in a way <br />5 that can bo fott rather Lhan argued. <br />Ty7,g 8 Ahd downtown Springffoltl is on the throshold of <br />7 chanpo, change that boars a roiationahip to our setting and to <br />8 our history. And this key regional faciitty..f.e part of that <br />9 chanpo. <br />10 It'c clear from our reading of the EIS that the <br />ti downtown river front s/te offers a distinct advantage in tarAi <br />12 of access, onvironwsntat intaprity and control. of tiw tong-tern <br />13 views shod. Tho U.6. federal courthouse conforms to the city's <br />14 long-term vision Por downtown. Thank you. <br />15 MR. MEERBCNEIDT: Thank you. <br />16 NR. LEVINE: Just want to ooint out -- I should have <br />17 said thic in the beginning, wo have sows computer siwulattona <br />18 over there of the different cites and that is not -- ire ~uat <br />19 used a comoosits bulltlfnp. <br />20 That's no indication of what the building Wight <br />21 look like that, that heen'L boon doslpnad yat..80 ,1uat wanted <br />22 CO CtatO that in case Lhefe'a any GOhfYaiOn. <br />23 MR. IEYINE: Is Davo Jowott hore4 <br />24 NR. JEMETT: My nave is Dava Jerrott, J-E-M-E-T-T. <br />25 I'm en attorney, I've boon M attorrwy in thiacowwuntty for <br />Final EIS 248 New Federal Courthouse <br />