New Search
Comments and Responses, September 27, 2000 Public Hearing in Springfield <br />T15.5--Comment acknowledged. <br />Transcript 2 <br />12 <br />T15A 1 be vary high. <br />confi. 2 And I'm not sure what you could do othor than <br />3 use it ea a werehou6e or as a retail spot. The other epaCO <br />4 that you hatl in hero, you have Lhe Little Narket, which was <br />b also I believe you said was Du11t fn '45, And that you gavo <br />8 it some significance because of the mon and pop Kay that it's <br />7 uaetl in the canaunity. Thera have been a nutn6er of mom end pop <br />8 etOros 1n the area end soao of thou cone antl eons of thou qo. <br />9 Th1a ono .lust hapoont to havo hung on a little <br />10 bit ion0er then some of tho root. It's not historic a: far ne <br />11 the Springfield NtetOr'-iC Co~mitt l0n fa COn00 reed. Ana I don't <br />12 think oven historic by the people Lhat are Uetnq it or the <br />13 people that own it. Antl that kind of brings sw to ttw last <br />14 point. <br />T16b IS I did talk Lo the owners of the four tax tats <br />10 which to Harmony Properties, and Hartnony ProOOrtleB would more <br />17 than be hopoy t.0 toe oonw tYOe of dovolopnont go into their <br />18 property. <br />19 Thoy have n0 intention of tlovoloping thomsolws <br />20 other than matntainin9 the Dutldinga that era there. And <br />21 actually the buildings baatcally havo not been swintafnatl too <br />22 well over the years. eo if you have any oueatlona for mo? <br />23 MR. NEERBCHEIOT: No. <br />24 MR. (iISCMEL: That will conclude. <br />2S MR. BLAND: Jack, sxcuao wa. <br />New Federal Courthouse 241 ~ Final EIS <br />