New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Final Environmental Impact Statement - New Federal Courthouse
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Final Environmental Impact Statement - New Federal Courthouse
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 8:07:39 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:26:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Environmental Impact
Document_Date
12/31/2000
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
421
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Socioeconomics <br />Construction of a new courthouse would result in a temporary infusion of money from the <br />federal government into the area, and this would increase total incomes in Eugene, Springfield, <br />and Lane County. Income would increase directly for workers associated with the project, and <br />indirectly through purchases of goods and services by these workers. Economic impacts from <br />construction would cease shortly after construction is finished. Operation of the courthouse <br />would not significantly increase income in the area. <br />Environmental Justice <br />The 1994 Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority <br />Populations and Low-Income Populations, requires each federal agency to make achieving <br />"environmental justice" part of its mission, to the maximum extent practicable. Each agency is <br />required to "identify and address, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human <br />health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations <br />and low-income populations in the United States." The order emphasizes incorporation of <br />minority and low-income groups into the decision-making process, as is already required under <br />the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). <br />Guidance provided by the Council on Environmental Quality Environmental Justice Guidance <br />Under the National Environmental Policy Act (1998) states that in order to form aminority/low- <br />income community, the minority/low-income populations of the affected area should exceed 50 <br />percent of the total population, or the minority/low-income populations should be "meaningfully <br />greater" than the minority/low-income population in the general population or other appropriate <br />unit of geographic analysis. <br />The overall Eugene/Springfield area and the areas surrounding the alternative courthouse sites <br />does not have minority or low-income populations greater than 50 percent and does not meet the <br />first criterion. As described above in the demographics section, the downtown/campus areas <br />have a high proportion of residents below the poverty level and a relatively high minority <br />population. The Riverfront area has a demographic composition very similar to that of the city <br />of Springfield, although the area has a large percentage of the city's Hispanic population (see <br />Table 9). <br />Given the higher poverty rate around the Eugene site (see Table 10), it appears that <br />environmental justice should be addressed in this EIS. There is also concern about the potential <br />for the federal courthouse to induce economic redevelopment in the Riverfront area and <br />adversely affect the Hispanic population in the area (see Table 9). <br />The proposed project has not, however, been designed, revised, or situated based on the presence <br />or absence of low-income or minority populations. In order to ensure environmental justice <br />through meaningful community representation, GSA conducted scoping meetings in close <br />proximity to the proposed sites and sent newsletters to all interested parties. After publication of <br />the draft EIS, a second newsletter was prepared and mailed to adjacent residents. The second <br />newsletter described the project status, announced the public hearings, and included a project <br />Fina! EIS 116 New Federal Courthouse <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.