Socioeconomics <br />Income <br />During the 1980s, Oregon's per capita income declined relative to that in the nation. The state's <br />sharp economic downturn and loss ofhigh-paying forest products jobs in the early 1980s reduced <br />Oregon's per capita income to 90 percent of the national average. Since 1990, rapid growth of <br />high-paying high technology and other manufacturing jobs in the Willamette Valley pushed this <br />region's per capita income from 95 percent of the national average in 1988 to 101 percent in <br />1997. Outside the valley, per capita income has remained about 80 percent of the national <br />average since 1990. Oregon's statewide per capita income rose to an estimated 95 percent of the <br />national average in 1997. <br />Significant Adverse Impacts <br />Population <br />The proposed courthouse project would have no long-term adverse impact on the population of <br />Eugene, Springfield, or Lane County. <br />Housing <br />No housing units would be displaced by development on either of the alternative sites. <br />Constructing the proposed courthouse could likely result in a temporary increase in the <br />population of the Eugene/Springfield metropolitan area, as construction workers move into the <br />azea for temporary construction jobs associated with the project. As discussed in greater detail <br />below in the employment section, the project would employ an average of 180 construction <br />workers and a peak construction work force of 250. Although the area has a developed <br />construction sector (approximately 2,500 construction workers in a total labor force of 55,000), it <br />is likely that out-of--town workers would be hired temporarily for the specialized construction <br />requirements of a high-rise structure with integrated security measures. <br />The most recent vacancy rate reported for rental units in the greater Eugene area is 4.98 percent, <br />which is at the equilibrium point for rental units. The influx of temporary construction workers <br />associated with the courthouse project would increase demand for rental housing, which would <br />decrease vacancy rates. There aze an estimated 22,800 apartment units in the Eugene/Springfield <br />azea (Duncan & Brown 1999). Assuming that the vacancy rate holds at the current rate of 4.98 <br />percent, Eugene would have more than 1,100 vacant units when construction begins. Therefore, <br />there would be enough vacant units available to house temporary construction workers. Adverse <br />impacts on housing availability would likely be minimized through local hires and by temporary <br />workers sharing rental quarters. Because most temporary construction workers would leave the <br />area after completion of the project and would not settle in the area, construction-phase housing <br />impacts would be temporary. Project construction would result in a temporary increase in the <br />demand for rental housing. <br />Final EIS. 112 New Federal Courthouse <br />