New Search
• BCC 2/8/00 with CITY MAYORS <br /> <br />Morrison noted that if the LCOG Board becomes the ACT, then the MPC will <br />have no existence around transportation issues. <br />Pirrie assumed that the MPC would still look at the projects inside the metro <br />area and those projects would be reviewed by the area commission. <br />Morrison stated the LCOG Board would be prioritizing projects across the <br />system. <br />Pirrie noted that an ACT looks at the projects that are area-wide and the total <br />inside the region. He noted the projects would be put into the four year STIP <br />and ODOT would be the primary body that carried it through. <br />Dwyer said it's not in the County's best interest to enter into the ACT unless <br />the County is the lead agency. <br />Pirrie suggested having Sorenson, the cities of Springfield and Eugene, the <br />LTD and LCOG Board and Susan Brody from the OTC discuss the OTC's <br />perspective, and the vision. <br />Weeldreyer stated if the County was the agency that administered this ACT, <br />that there would still be the requirement for all cities and stakeholders to be <br />represented. <br />Sorenson added that this might give Lane County an opportunity to look for <br />alternatives. <br />4. OTHER ISSUES <br />None. <br />There being no further business, Commissioner Sorenson adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. <br />Melissa Zimmer <br />Recording Secretary <br />%' V x <br />::~, . <br />~"'~'Back to Board Notices <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />Contact the ~cvebmaster cr coaane.or.us Read the Lade County_Liability_Disclaimer and <br />User Agreeme~it <br />URL: <br />Updated: 03/17/00 htt~://www.co.lane.onus/BCC_Info/Meeting_Info/2000% <br />20 M in utes/February/00-2-8 j t. htm <br />Copyright ©1997 Lane County Information Services.. All rights reserved. <br />http://www.co.lane.or.us/BCC Info/Meeting_Info/2000%20Minutes/February/00 2-8jt.htm 12/4/00: <br />