New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
City/County Road Partnership & Proposed County Capital Project Partnership
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
City/County Road Partnership & Proposed County Capital Project Partnership
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 11:01:05 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:26:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Transportation
PW_Subject
Roads Partnership
Document_Date
2/28/2001
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~. BCC 2/8/00 with CITY MAYORS <br />Lane County is currently receiving. He added that legislation allows each <br />county commission to establish a local option registration fee of $10 per year <br />and Lane County in 1998 had 300,000 registered vehicles. He said that Lane <br />County could receive another $3 million in road fund revenue that would be <br />available to Lane County. <br />B. Federal Timber Legislation Briefing. <br />Van_ Vactor reported that 1999 was a busy year with federal forest fund <br />stabilization. He noted that Lane County gets 25% of discretionary general <br />fund from O & C timber revenue that is equally critical. He noted that HB 2389 <br />has passed the Congress on November 3, 1999 and Senators Wyden and Craig <br />have put together a compromise legislation, Senate Bill 1608, that is similar to <br />HB 2389. He thanked De Fazio who was critical in getting HB 2389 moving. <br />He noted the administration has placed funding for this legislation in the <br />President's proposed budget. He said currently there are negotiations between <br />members of Congress and the administration. He requested the help of the <br />cities to get either HB 2389, SB 1608, or a reasonable compromise passed by <br />Congress. He added citizens of Lane County have been beneficiaries of the <br />partnership with the national forest and O & C and if the cities were willing, <br />letters of support would be helpful. <br />Snowden reiterated the affect of the timber legislation as more significant than <br />the passage of Measure 82 for the County. He noted in Fiscal 03/04, if Measure <br />82 passes, the County will get about $17 million per year from the gas tax. He <br />added in full implementation, Measure 82 would give the County $3.5 million <br />more per year than Lane County would otherwise get. He noted if HB 2389 is <br />made law, the County will get $12 million more per year than relying on <br />funding tied to the actual harvest. <br />Mayor Jim Torrey, City of Eugene, said the monies need to be taken to shore <br />up the existing road basis. He was not interested in dragging this out over a <br />number of years. He said it needs to be maintained and he is prepared to lobby <br />as hard as possible. He said that $2.5 million will not break the bank and hopes <br />t11e County can come up with the $2.5 million. He asked what would happen in <br />the future if the legislation or state gas tax is not passed. He added he did not <br />want Coiuity revenues kept in reserve for the needs of the County road system. <br />He suggested working together to get a positive solution in Washington, D.C. <br />Dwyer agreed with continuing the money as long as possible, but said it does <br />not need to be a blank check. He said Lane County is shrinking and there needs <br />to be a discussion on how. to protect the citizens from what government may <br />see as a benefit to them. He declared it is the Board's responsibility to protect <br />those citizens. <br />Fred Simmons, City of Springfield, said everyone is a County resident and a <br />strategy needs to be determined to meet the needs of all the people. He <br />suggested pursuing the program as it is but resolving some of the issues of the <br />;;- Urban Transition Agreement. He said it was the Board's charge to make sure <br />the funds are available for this year and then work with the state for resolution <br />in the future. <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />http://www.co.lane.or.us/BCC Info/Meeting_Info/2000%24Minutes/February/00 2-8jt.htm 12/4/00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.