New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
City/County Road Partnership & Proposed County Capital Project Partnership
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
City/County Road Partnership & Proposed County Capital Project Partnership
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 11:01:05 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:26:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Transportation
PW_Subject
Roads Partnership
Document_Date
2/28/2001
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1/3/01 am Page 4 of 9 <br />at the state system) the Board would be working with the cities and would provide <br />advantages to address countywide issues. <br />Morrison suggested Snowden come back to the Board with the <br />scenarios on switching the percentages and if the state were to take <br />the money. <br />Dwyer said the Roads Advisory Committee would be a good <br />vehicle to examine what the criteria would be. He didn't want to <br />rush this along, but said they needed to look at the best criteria to <br />give the County leverage and develop different criteria for <br />discussion. <br />Morrison said the Board wanted to give this to the Roads Advisory <br />Committee to develop options as a starting point with the public <br />works departments from the different cities. <br />Sorenson was in favor of giving this to the Roads Advisory <br />Committee. <br />Green said that there needed to be a policy level discussion. He <br />wanted Option 2. <br />Snowden stated it should be structured in a way that ODOT sees <br />that Lane County would be bringing money to the table in these <br />projects. He said Lane County would be a true partner. He said <br />they would give the Roads Advisory Committee a draft CIP at its <br />January meeting. He added they would roll over the existing <br />projects from the current CIP and not add new ones. He said they <br />would have underfilled latter years in the CIP. He said that would <br />be released to the public and then they .would work to develop <br />criteria for the program and get it back to the Board in March. <br />Weeldreyer stated it was important for the Board to set the policy <br />first before the Roads Advisory Committee comes up with criteria <br />so they have policy direction. <br />b. - ORDER 01-_1-3-1/In the Matter of Reappointing Two Members to <br />the Roads Advisory Committee. <br />MOTION: to approve reappointing Tom Poage and Rex Redmon <br />for ORDER 01-1-3-1. <br />Dwyer MOVED, Green SECONDED. <br />VOTE: 5-0. <br />c. FIRST READING AND SETTING SECOND READING AND <br />PUBLIC HEARING/Ordinance PA 1158/In the Matter of <br />__ __ _. <br />Amending the Rural Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate Land from <br />"Forest" and "Agricultural" to "Marginal Land" and Rezoning that <br />http://www.co.lane.or.us/BCC_Info/Meeting_Info/2001%20Minutes/January/01-1-3am.htm 3/2/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.