~> <br />took over the responsibility for funding this broader range of service in return for increased <br />funding for City road-related operations, maintenance and capital improvements. <br />Over the past several years, the City has continued to request jurisdictional transfer of roads <br />within newly annexed areas, as required by the County/City Partnership agreement. To date we <br />have accepted over 44 miles of County road transfers. Eugene has basically two sources of road <br />fiznd re~vpnue that are available to be used to operate and maintain the 494 miles of urban streets <br />in the city, State Highway Funds and Lane County Road Funds. The other primary transportation ~--~~- <br />funds (SDC's and assessments) can only be used for capacity enhancement projects. <br />You have requested a summary of how County Road funds received by the City have been used <br />over the past five years. As verified by the recent study included in the Transpian update, State <br />Highway Fund revenues are not sufficient to cover operations, maintenance and capital <br />preservation needs. From FY96 through FY00 the City has spent over $40.3 million on <br />operation and maintenance of the City road system, including 213 traffic signals, 530 miles of <br />striping, over 7500 street lights and 23,000 signs. Over that period the County/City Partnership <br />Road Fund contribution to the City was $10.5 million, representing approximately 26 percent of <br />the City expenditures for operation, maintenance and preservation. Based on the Transplan <br />study, Eugene's resources available for system operations, maintenance and preservation were <br />only 85 percent of the needed amount according to the estimates of urban service costs by <br />Oregon Department of Transportation_ <br />Since FY96, the combined revenues from State Highway Funds and Lane County Road Funds to <br />the City of Eugene have been decreasing annually (from $8.26m in FY96 to $7.lOm in FY00) as <br />the system size and complexity have grown. The recent legislative action to increase the State <br />Highway Fund contribution to the City would have brought us back to FY961evel of funding, <br />without consideration for inflationary impacts and .increased system requirements. The <br />suspension of new state revenues pending the upcoming May elections, combined with the <br />question of Lane County Road Fund contributions to the City places the transportation system in <br />the City of Eugene in jeopardy. <br />We appreciate the concern of the Lane County Board in the long term picture for road financing <br />in the County.. We also appreciate the long standing partnership basis for the County/City Road <br />agreement and look forward to discussing the opportunities for continuing the participation of the <br />County in the urban transportation system supporting the economic hub of the County. <br />Sincerely, <br />James D. Torrey <br />Mayor <br />ce: Jim Johnson, City Manager <br />Chris Andersen, Public Works Director <br />44 <br />