|
4
<br />10.0
<br />9.0
<br />8.0
<br />7.0
<br />` 6.0
<br />C
<br />r 5.0
<br />a
<br />~ 4.0
<br />c
<br />3.0
<br />2.D
<br />1.0
<br />o.o
<br />2000
<br />8.4
<br />7.8
<br />7.a While unemployment in Eugene
<br />6.a increased by nearly one-third
<br />toregon (31 %) from 2000 to 2004, it was
<br />Portland overshadowed by a 42% increase
<br />Eugene both in Portland and statewide.
<br />~~Salem
<br />Paved lane miles assessed in satisfactory or better condition as a percentage of
<br />total lane miles assessed: ICMA cities over 100,000 population
<br />Unemployment statewide and in Oreaon cities over 100.000
<br />Only 57% of Eugene's
<br />paved lane miles were
<br />rated satisfactory or good,
<br />compared to an average of
<br />73% for all ICMA cities.
<br />Eugene spent $2,074.80 per
<br />paved lane mile on road
<br />rehabilitation, which is 15%
<br />less than the ICMA cities'
<br />average of $2,432.70,
<br />Las Vegas, NV
<br />Orlando, FL
<br />Phoenix, AZ
<br />Tyler, TX
<br />Gainesville, FL
<br />Bellevue, WA
<br />San Antonio, TX
<br />San Jose, CA
<br />Des Moines, IA
<br />Dallas, TX
<br />Mesa, AZ '-
<br />Savannah, GA
<br />Tallahassee, FL
<br />Reno, NV
<br />Corpus Christi, TX
<br />Westminster, CO
<br />Austin, TX
<br />Salt Lake City, UT
<br />Henderson, NV
<br />Vancouver, WA
<br />San Diego, CA
<br />Eugene, OR
<br />Long Beach, CA
<br />Oklahoma City, OK
<br />D% 1D%
<br />Importance to the public that the City engage in
<br />environmentally sustainable practices
<br />6a°i°
<br />5D%
<br />„ 40%
<br />~ 30%
<br />`m
<br />a 20%
<br />10%
<br />0%
<br />1 =Not 2 3 4 5 =Very
<br />important Mean rating = 4.2 important
<br />Source: City of Eugene Community Survey, November 2004
<br />Perceptions of how well the City engages in
<br />environmentally sustainable practices
<br />6D%
<br />50%
<br />40%
<br />r
<br />30%
<br />a 20%
<br />10%
<br />0%
<br />1 = Paor 2
<br />44%
<br />34%
<br />9%
<br />T -T-^-~
<br />3 4 5 =Excellent
<br />Meanrating = 3.4
<br />Source: City of Eugene Community Survey, November 2004
<br />Ranking of top 15 ICMA cities in percent of light vehicles using
<br />alternative fuel
<br />Las Vegas, NV 92.3%
<br />Mesa, AZ 54.8%
<br />Long Beach, CA 32.3%
<br />Oakland, CA 20.4%
<br />San Jose, CA 18.0%
<br />Oak Park, IL 17.2%
<br />Austin, TX 17.D%
<br />San Antonio, TX 11.2%
<br />Eugene, OR ~ ~•"~< 9.0%
<br />Coral Springs, FL 8.8%
<br />rucson, Az 8.7°i° The City has set an ambitious
<br />Carpus Christi, TX 6.9% goal to increase the percentage
<br />Phoenix, AZ 6.8%
<br />Longmont, co 5.6°i° of hybrid sedans in its fleet to
<br />Mission, BC 5.6% 40% by FY09, up from 12% in
<br />0 % 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ~04'•
<br /> Percent of light vehicles using alternative fuel
<br /> Source: ICMACenterlorPerformance Measurement, 2004
<br />Ranking of ICMA cities by percent ofinedium-duty vehicles using
<br />alternative fuels
<br />Las Vegas, NV
<br />Coral Springs, FL
<br />Eugene, OR
<br />Long Beach, CA
<br />Oklahoma City, OK
<br />Tucson, AZ
<br />Phoenix, AZ
<br />Colorado Springs, CO
<br />Austin, TX
<br />Eugene passenger top-10 destinations
<br />Los Angeles (direct)
<br />Las Vegas (direct)
<br />San Francisco (direct)
<br />Phoenix (direct)
<br />San Diego (connecting)
<br />Denver (direct)
<br />SeattlelTacoma (direct)
<br />Chicago (connecting)
<br />Orlando (connecting
<br />Orange County (connecting)
<br />
<br />Six of the top 10 destinations for
<br />Eugene-area travelers have direct
<br />service from Eugene Airport.
<br />5
<br />0% 1D% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 9D% 100%
<br />Percent using alternative fuels
<br />Source: ICMA Center far Performance Measurement, 2004
<br />2001 2002 2003 20D4
<br />20% 3D% 4D% 50% 60% 70% 80% 9D% 100%
<br />Percent
<br />Source: ICMA Center Por Performance Measurement, 2004
<br />0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%
<br />Percent of all Eugene travelers
<br />
|