New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2008-2011 STIP Final
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
2008-2011 STIP Final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2009 11:13:38 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:22:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
ODOT
PW_Subject
STIP
Document_Date
1/16/2008
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
449
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FINAL 2008-2011 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM <br />D.l. Construction STIP Eligibility Criteria for Bridge Footnotes <br />16Bridge Management System <br />State Brid e Project Selection <br />This criterion applies to bridges on the State highway system only. Through an agreement between the <br />State and the Association of Oregon Counties (AOC) and the League of Oregon Cities (LOC), the federal <br />Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Project funds are divided between the State and local <br />agencies based on the percentages of deficient bridges. Local bridge projects are covered through a sepa- <br />rate selection process. <br />State bridge projects proposed for funding will be selected based on the desire to maintain and improve <br />transportation's role in Oregon's economy. Traditionally, modernization funding will pay for major im- <br />provements to the transportation system including the bridge work. The State Bridge Program will sup- <br />port OTIA, freight mobility, life safety and protection of the transportation infrastructure investment. <br />Focusing on the Interstate Highway and Oregon Highway Plan Freight Routes, consider bridges as candi- <br />dates based on the following: <br />• Bridges that are presently load restricted or could become restricted in the near future. <br />• Bridges that preserve freight corridors, detour and other lifeline routes. <br />• Other structural, safety and functional considerations. <br />D.2. Construction STIP Prioritization Factors for Bridge Footnotes <br />1~Bridge Options Report <br />Priority will be given to projects that support the Updated Bridge Options Report adopted by the Oregon <br />Transportation Commission. <br />18Bridge Projects that Best Support the Oregon Highway Plan Policies <br />Oregon Highway Plan policies that are applicable to bridge projects may include but are not necessarily <br />limited to the following (Table 1): <br />• lA, 1B, 1C, 1D, lE, 1F, 1G, 1H, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2F, 2G, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B, 4C, and SA <br />ivLeverage and Public Benefit for C-STIP Bridge Projects <br />ACTS, MPOs and regional or statewide advisory groups should evaluate how proposed projects leverage <br />additional funding or collateral community benefits and make wise and efficient use of infrastructure and <br />natural resources. Examples of leverage and public benefits for C-STIP bridge replacement/rehabilitation <br />projects include: <br />• Other funding contributions, such as additional federal funds, local matching funds or provision <br />of project right-of--way, private funding. <br />• Bundling with other infrastructure projects (provided no adverse affect on project readiness). <br />• Environmental enhancement, such as culvert replacement and improved drainage. <br />• Direct benefits to multiple modes of travel. This would include local efforts to accommodate non- <br />auto modal opportunities. <br />• Improvements in Oregon's economy by addressing transportation challenges. <br />Page 349 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.