FINAL 2008-2011 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM <br />III. Construction STIP (C-STIP) <br />A. Introduction to the C-STIP <br />The C-STIP contains projects scheduled for construction and is financially constrained by year. Applica- <br />tion of the C-STIP Eligibility Criteria and Prioritization Factors includes Modernization, Preservation and <br />Bridge projects. Information about other STIP programs in the STIP may be found in the Draft 2006- <br />2009 STIP. <br />B. Modernization <br />As stated in the Oregon Highway Plan, "The primary goal of modernization projects is to add capacity to <br />the highway system in order to facilitate existing traffic and/or accommodate projected traffic growth. <br />Modernization means capacity-adding projects including HOV lanes and off-system improvements. Pro- <br />jects in this category include major widening of lanes or bridges, and the addition of lanes, rest areas or <br />entire facilities." Where a culvert is replaced with a bridge due to environmental analysis concluding that <br />this is necessary, the project is not considered modernization. <br />5.1. Construction STIP Eligibility Criteria for Modernization Footnotes <br />SConsistency with Comprehensive Plans and Transportation System Plans (TSP) <br />The proposal must show that the project is consistent with the applicable adopted comprehensive plan or <br />transportation system plan as a planned facility, including land use decisions that establish need, mode, <br />function and general location, including goal exceptions, where required. If consistency cannot be dem- <br />onstrated the project submission will describe how the inconsistency will be addressed, including changes <br />to the project, TSP and/or comprehensive plan and when they need to be completed. In such cases, the <br />ACT or regional or statewide advisory group may recommend that the project be included in the D-STIP, <br />and request that Transportation Planning Rule issues be addressed. <br />Proposed projects from within MPOs shall be identified in fiscally constrained Regional Transportation <br />Plans and shall meet air quality conformity requirements. <br />6Consistency with Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) Policy 1G, Action 1G.1, on Major Improvements <br />In order to demonstrate that a project is consistent with OHP Policy 1G, Action 1G.1, the proposal must <br />show that the project and/or the TSP clearly addressed the prioritization criteria found in Action 1G.1 of <br />the OHP. <br />Where needed to achieve consistency with the above-noted Oregon Highway Plan policy, the ACTS, <br />MPOs, or regional or statewide advisory groups, with ODOT assistance, shall negotiate conditions for <br />project approval with an applicant. These conditions, if not addressed as the project proceeded through <br />the D-STIP if applicable, shall be attached to the application approved by the ACT, MPO or regional or <br />statewide advisory group, shall be as specific as possible given the stage of development of the project, <br />and may include the following: <br />• Interchange Area Management Plan or Access Management Plan, <br />• Highway segment designations, <br />• Needed local street improvements, <br />• Traffic management plans, <br />• Land use plan designations, <br />• Other similar conditions. <br />Page 345 <br />