construction. This could involve options ranging from an emphasis on Initiating .change, especially. in an urban context, poses challenges as <br /> restoration to adaptive reuse in new, larger buildings. On the other well as opportunities. We recognize that significant new development <br /> hand, a proposal to restore the Taco Time (originally First National intheWestBroadwayareawillbedisruptivetosomeexistingbusinesses <br /> Bank) and Shaw-Med (originally Public Market) buildings to resemble and organizations; some who are current tenants of buildings that may <br /> their original forms only received 2 votes in favor. On two other be sold and subject to new construction, will have to move to new <br /> proposals the. committee was more evenly divided: these had to locations. The WBAC has, throughout its deliberations, maintained <br /> do with allowing new construction. on the Taco Time and Shaw-Med the position that local businesses and tenants-many of them <br /> sites, or delaying such construction pending more in-depth historical longtime contributors to our downtown-be treated with dignity <br /> research (an assessment of the historic values of these properties and respect, and that the city will exercise great care and provide <br /> prepared for the committee by Venerable Properties, LLC. is included significant expertise in helping them to make successful transitions, . <br /> in Appendix C). and in cases vvhere it is feasible, help local businesses relocate in new <br /> buildings a ong West Broadway. Our recommendations in section V <br /> On this question it would be fair to say Ghat committee member's are noteworthy in going significantly beyond the levels of assistance <br /> views reflected the range of reasonable opinion. outlined. in a recent required in Federal and State statutes for relocation assistance in urban <br /> Register-Guard editorial on historic preservation: that caution should redevelopment areas; we would urge he council to consider these as <br /> be exercised on such matters as the wrecking ball is'final; and at the a comprehensive package, rather than a sampling of individual menu <br /> same time we should acknowledge when once-historic properties items. <br /> have been so fundamentally altered that there is little left of their <br /> 'historic character. It should be noted that no committee members Finally, we_note that change_is a core feature_of urban-life and _ <br /> said the issue of historic restoration should preclude the .attainment placemaking: wCities are places of economic and cultural dynamism, <br /> of the density, or mix of uses, objectives desired by the committee and diversity. New ideas emerge alongside the old, .new uses: replace , <br /> (and developers. in their initial proposals); furthermore, no proposal older uses, our built environment. evolves-one example is the <br /> precluded new additional construction (for example, adding stories emphasis in this report on building energy-efficient, sustainable <br /> above) on the two sites in question, regardless of .any determination buildings. A progressive vision for downtown is one that guides <br /> of their historic value. change, rather than merely reacting to it. Eugene has rightfully <br /> earned a national reputation as one ofthe nation's most livable cities. <br /> In short, the committee's views regarding the status of these two Building and maintaining a vibrant downtown is a key to maintaining j <br /> .buildings. simply. indicate that there. is a range of opinion involving that leadership. We offer this report and the recommendations herein <br /> aesthetics, the definition of `historic values; the .level of research or as our contribution to that: effort. <br /> information required, cost/benefit analysis, and the proper forum for <br /> such determinations, such that it was not possible to reach a definitive <br /> conclusion in the time frame in which we were operating. <br /> <br /> 60 ~ ~ c~nclu>ion I <br /> <br />