New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2007 Pavement Management Report
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
2007 Pavement Management Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 8:32:27 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:20:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Maintenance
PWA_Project_Area
Road Repair
PW_Subject
Pavement Management
Document_Date
3/1/2007
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SCOPE <br />Eugene's street system is an extensive network of various types of traveling surfaces under the <br />City's jurisdiction: In the following report, definitions of pavement types, improvement <br />status, and functional classifications are provided and categorized in terms of both centerline <br />mileage and 12' wide lane miles: <br />A brief history and. description of the Pavement Management System (PMS) used by the City <br />will be discussed. Components of PMS, such as pavement inspectio equency, pavement <br />conditions which are described by the Overall Condition Index (O reports produced <br />by PMS .are addressed. <br />Highlighted in the report is the pavement preservation pr gr~ which began in 2003. <br />Outlined are the typical types of preservation treatme c ent lane Tile unit cost for <br />each treatment, what condition or OCI a project is r mmended for preser~~tn, and a <br />current treatment needs cost analysis is given. A table is provided detailing the ~-~it funding <br />sources for PPP. <br />For an effective preservation program, coordinated effo equired by the Maintenance and <br />Engineering Divisions, therefore both r e discussed lot the report. Preservation <br />project selection, interim maintenance pr i,- n. and ultim l~-eject construction or <br />deferral for future reconstruction is discuss~l in a~tditicrnal detail. 'his report lists and maps a <br />one year proposed project list in addition to ruj~; ~ coy o date. <br />Three funding scenarios a re e d through tl analysis program in _PMS. We look at the <br />current funding, a l E million 1Iding and a s ario where all reconstruct projects are <br />3 <br />rehabilitated. It is impo ton e the analysis, mes are set up fora 10-year projection, <br />and at this time t e are fo i~ phalt streets only. These analyses provide <br />necessary ' gar ndition sand rehabilitation needs. Utilizing current <br />" ~ ' le ter street system remains in the present level of <br />.lso, ~~~hat funding level will create an improvement in our <br />70 million backlog? <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.