New Search
Y <br />i. <br />Is. <br />JONES Eric R <br />From: OLLERENSHAW James <br />Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 4:36 PM <br />To: JONES Eric R <br />Subject: RE: Draft Environmental Review Report <br />If you have any comments, please get them to me by Thursday Feb 8th. Thanks <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: JONES Eric R <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 1:51 PM <br />To: OLLERENSHAW James <br />Subject: RE: Draft Environmental Review Report <br />Yes, we do. In a brief discussion with Les, it sounds like EPT would like some additional clarifications in the <br />consultant's report as well as, possibly, an introductory element produced by City staff providing additional context on <br />the technical report. All in all, I'm guessing the release is a month out (???). However, our plans for getting <br />information to Council, staff, and the broader public still seem sound. Les suggested an additional objective in our <br />outreach as well: providing education to the public that their day-to-day activities (exemplified, for example, by the <br />potential consequences of the City's fleet and general office operations) can impact the environment in general and <br />fish habitat specifically. <br />Let's continue to talk about the details of the public info plan. <br />Eric) <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: OLLERENSHAW James <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:55 PM <br />To: JONES Eric R <br />Subject: Draft Environmental Review Report <br />Eric, I'm sending you via courier a copy of the draft Environmental Review report from CH2M Hill. Mostly an FYI, <br />but we need to continue to think about the public info piece. <br />~~ ~ d <br />~. ~ ~.- ~_, ., ,' . w . y v, ~~. ~~ <br />