Mr. Mulligan recalled when the Hult Center opened there was controversy surrounding the Soreng <br />Theater, the smaller venue in the performing arts center, and whether it was needed. He was encouraged <br />by the "explosion" of the arts scene. He asked if, in approaching the comprehensive plan, the other venues <br />outside the City would be taken into account and leveraged to create "something bigger than the whole." <br />Ms. Jones affirmed that this was the objective. She averred that all of the parties needed to be brought <br />together to discuss how a comprehensive plan could be formulated to everyone's benefit. <br />Mr. Mulligan asked for an estimate of the cost for a comprehensive plan. Ms. Jones replied that the <br />division had yet to identify the costs. She explained that the division wanted to make sure the proposed <br />plan was brought as a "heads up" in order to attain support for it. She thought, at this point, the plan could <br />be comprised of a variety of things. She said a placeholder had been identified as an unfunded project in <br />the C1P which contained the division's best guess as to the cost. <br />Ms. Solomon asked if the division was working with Downtown Eugene, Inc (DEI). She noted that DEI <br />was closely aligned with the goals of the Cultural Services Division and was involved in strategy <br />development to increase activity in the downtown area: Ms. Jones responded that the division was <br />working with them, adding that a meeting had been scheduled with DEI. <br />Mr. Kelly thanked Ms. Jones and Mr. Hankins for all they did to help make the City "a great place to be." <br />He stressed the importance of cultural services to the livability of the City of Eugene as well as to the <br />economic engine. He supported moving forward with the comprehensive plan. <br />In response to a question from Mr. Kelly, Mr. Hankins stated that City funding for the Jacobs Gallery had <br />been cut after Ballot Measure 47 and now only existed through the collaborative efforts of three entities: <br />the Cultural Services Division, the Lane Arts Council, and the Jacobs Gallery Steering. Committee. <br />Tina Rinaldi, director of the gallery, explained that the City provided the space and Lane Arts Council <br />provided the 501(c)(3) fiscal agency under which the gallery could raise tax deductible funds. She said <br />neither of those entities provided direct funding to the gallery: The gallery was responsible for certain <br />funds going to the City for services that it used and to the Lane Arts Council as a fiscal agency fee. She <br />stated that the Jacobs Gallery Steering Committee was responsible for all of the fund-raising. <br />Ms. Bettman congratulated Mr. Hankins on receiving official recognition, adding that it was "well- <br />deserved." She called the Cultural Services Division a major asset in the community in terms of education <br />and outreach, as well as in terms of economic development. She noted that many of the area's youth <br />perform in the Hult Center. She felt it fulfilled multiple objectives from the City's point of view and had <br />potential for fulfilling even more objectives. <br />In response fo a question from Ms. Bettman, Ms. Jones stated that having $1.5 million in reserve, <br />essentially enough to run the division for four. months, was the division's goal. <br />Ms. Bettman commented that the Cultural Services Division did not seem to be the appropriate "home" for <br />the outstanding balance of the City's portion of the loan for Hayward Field, which originated in the 1970s. <br />She asked when the loan would be paid off. Ms. Jones replied that it would be complete in 2007. Ms. <br />Bettman wondered if the City could fmd another "home" for that loan. <br />Ms. Rygas asked what the plan was for the programmatic elements of the comprehensive plan. Ms. Jones <br />responded that once the recommendations had been developed and costs were associated with them, like <br />MINUTES-Eugene Budget Committee February 22, 2005 Page 11 <br />