New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2006 Community Survey Report
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
2006 Community Survey Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 8:17:47 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:08:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Community Survey
Document_Date
1/11/2007
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COMMUNITY SURVEY <br />FOR THE CITY OF EUGENE <br />December, 2006 <br />PURPOSE OF THE STUDY <br />The purpose of this study is to assist the City of Eugene in determining community perceptions <br />regarding the quality of life and the quality of city services in Eugene. <br />METHODOLOGY <br />Advanced Marketing Research was hired to conduct the research project in order to obtain <br />unbiased and statistically valid results. <br />Using questions proposed by the City of Eugene, Advanced Marketing Research designed a <br />questionnaire instrument to be administered by telephone. The sampling frame consisted of a list <br />of Eugene residents purchased from KM Lists (a company which provides random sample lists <br />of residents drawn from a variety of sources) and overlaid with registered voter information <br />(where applicable) by Labels and Lists (a company which provides voter registration lists only). <br />401 interviews were completed. The sample was stratified to reflect population demographics of <br />Eugene. Telephone interviews were conducted between December 1 and December 14, 2006. <br />Proper data analysis techniques were employed by Advanced Marketing Research to avoid <br />introducing unnecessary error and bias into the study. These include, but. are not limited to the <br />"' ~ following: use of computer assisted telephone interviewing (trained interviewers input the data <br />into the computer as it is collected), selecting the sample using random means, attempting to call <br />each phone number ten to fifteen times, conducting 400 interviews in order to achieve a plus or <br />minus 4.5% bound on error, and validating a minimum of 10% of each interviewer's work. <br />COMPARING STUDIES FROM YEAR TO YEAR <br />The minimum difference required for statistical significance in comparison of percentages for <br />two groups of 400 each is 7 percentage points. So, to compare the response of a question asked <br />of 400 respondents in one year to the response of the same question asked of 400 respondents in <br />a different year, we are 95% certain that the answers are significantly different if they vary by at <br />least 7 percentage points. <br />Advanced Marketing Research, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.