New Search
Another classic example of a true reimbursement is where multiple agencies go together to co-sponsor a diversity training, bring in <br /> a big-name speaker, etc. One agency serves as the coordinator and incurrs all of the costs for the event, but then later, the other <br /> agencies are billed their proportional share--and the repayment is credited back against the original expenditure accounts that <br /> were hit with the expenses. PW Day is a closer-to-home example, where Eric has everything coded to 8920 initially, but then we, <br /> "spread" the costs back to the other funds/divisions according to some logical methodology--which results in a reimbursement to <br /> Eric's program. <br /> ,Wally, we don't bring in "revenue" against expenditure accounts, because that would be a circumvention of Oregon Local <br /> Budget Law (i.e., hiding expenditures). A true reimbursement is one of the few exceptions to that general rule. I appreciate your <br /> diligence, Debbie, in wanting to get these transactions recorded correctly and making sure we're doing the "right thing." <br /> ~becky <br /> From: CLARK Debbie D <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:54 AM <br /> To: JONES Eric R; CARLSON Becky A <br /> Cc: PETERSON Tish A <br /> Subject: RE: Metro waterways ad <br /> E`I6:, <br /> f still have nc~t seen fhe ad from Eugene Weekly, I have been waiting to bill LCC9~. <br /> Becky, <br /> When : bi11 .COG what account sh®uld I use. (535-8920-4xxxx}? <br /> -.~:)eI~I1ie <br /> From: JONES Eric R <br /> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 12:25 PM <br /> To: CLARK Debbie D <br /> Cc: PETERSON Tish A <br /> Subject: FW: Metro waterways ad <br /> A heads up that we'll be incurring about $750 worth of advertising related to the metro waterways project (grant project code <br /> 360610). Options: <br /> . Take the from 535-8920-61731, invoice to LCOG, and receipt the reimbursement from LCOG as closely as possible to <br /> this ACK; <br /> . Absorb the expense as part of our match on the federal If we choose the latter, I'd prefer to charge the expense <br /> somewhere other than 8920. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Eric) <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Hayes, Richard H NWP [mailto:Richard.H.Hayes@nwp0l.usace.army.mil] <br /> <br /> .Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:40 AM <br /> To: KRUEGER Jeff; JONES Eric R <br /> Subject: RE: Metro waterways ad <br /> Gr.•nds good, Jeff. <br /> ahead and process this between. the city and LCOG -whatever you guys think best... <br /> thx, Rick <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> 6/8/2006 <br /> <br />