BA .LINE/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGE-BEQUEST <br />Date: December 8. 2009 <br />Department: Public Works Department Contact: Becky Carlson <br />Check one: X Baseline Adjustment <br />Service Level Change <br />1. User Code # 8900 Revenues <br />Fund(s): - oa +und <br />4222-42103(new account). $(1,845,000) <br />Expenditures <br />Fund(s): 131 -Road Fund <br />9991-98000 $ 1,845,000 <br />Net $: -0- <br />FTE: -0- <br />2. Decision Package Title and Brief Description: <br />New City Surcharge on Garbage Haulers Dedicated to Road O&M Funding - <br />The City Manager has indicated intention to develop the FY10 Road Fund. budget based on funding <br />assumptions to include one or more proposed new revenues dedicated to funding road operations and <br />maintenance activities in order to close the projected FY10 funding gap of nearly $3 million and keep the <br />fund solvent in FY10 and beyond. The second of these two proposed new revenue sources is a 10% <br />transportation surcharge assessed on solid waste haulers to better reflect the impact their activities impose on <br />the street system as a result of heavy vehicles running on most every city street at least once a week. The <br />upper end of the estimated yield .range for this new surcharge at the 10% level is $1.845 million for FY10. <br />Additional Explanation for Internal Purposes- <br />The transportation surcharge on haulers is currently being proposed as a flat percentage. of subject hauler fee <br />revenue and would vary in amount by account,, based on the frequency of collection service and the <br />customer category. At the proposed 10% level, the transportation surcharge is estimated to raise up to <br />$1.845 million in additional annual revenue, and a residential customer with weekly 32-gallon service would <br />see an increase in their monthly garbage fees of approximately $1.97 per month. <br />Note: This new-fee proposal results in no new spending authority for Road Fund and no change in the level <br />of service. It is simply helps fill a significant funding gap in maintaining current service levels. <br />3. Is this aone-time expenditure request? _ N/A <br />4. Justification of request; consequences if denied; impact on other funds: <br />This proposal is consistent with the City Manager's intentions as expressed to the City Council on <br />November 12, 2008. Without new revenues of approximately $3 million which can be practically and <br />realistically implemented by July 1, 2009, the city's Road Fund will immediately need to begin to <br />implement a strategy of severe service reductions to correct the structural deficiency which threatens to <br />send the fund into insolvency sometime in the fall of 2009. There would be no: impact on other funds as <br />a result of this new proposed revenue. <br />5. Specific Council goal/action priority related to this request, if any: <br />This budget strategy is a key component in achieving the outcomes- identified in the City Council's <br />Transportation Initiative, which is to "Develop mechanisms to adequately fund our transportation system <br />for cars, trucks, bikes and pedestrians including maintenance and preservation and capital reconstruction." <br />6. Service category and specific service profile strategy related to the request: <br />Transportation Services -Strategy 1: Prioritize operations and maintenance services and match service <br />