New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Fund 341 FY10 Fund Balancing
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Operating
>
2010
>
Fund 341 FY10 Fund Balancing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2010 12:52:25 PM
Creation date
2/12/2009 4:57:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Fund Folder
Fiscal_Year
2010
PW_Division
Administration
GL_Fund
341
GL_ORG
9332
Identification_Number
Fund 341
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> ' City of Eugene <br /> Public Works <br /> FY10 Fund Balancing Review <br /> ~ Fund 341 (Note: Fund 341 was Fund 312 in prior years) <br /> Prepared by: T Smith <br /> Reviewed by: B Carlson 2/11/09 <br /> i <br /> Review Comment Response <br /> 1. Have we talked to Finn/Kitty ab ut how to show the renumbering <br /> of Fund 312 to Fund 341? I don't thir~~c we would want to accomplish <br /> this with abudgeted-legal transfer, since these two funds are, in fact, <br /> one and the same fund, just with a new~isystem number. I don't even <br /> ~ know how you would present a' legal fun°d transfer from a single fund <br /> to itself. ~ I think what we're going <br /> to want to do on the system is to make ~ BWC to BWC adjustment <br /> ~ (if Budget is able to do this in the sytem~ whereby the $279,965 <br /> ending balance just "poofs!"from Func~312 and magically reappears w, ~,~g, <br /> <br /> j in Fund 341 as of July 1. Then on they actuals side, we do a JE to <br /> I close out the actual. audited Fund 312 Fund Balance as of July 1 and <br /> .make it reappear in Fund 341 on th same date. Can we override <br /> i , <br /> BWC in these reports to show that r FY10? Remember all we're Becky, I have attached Fin ' -mail on this discussion. I <br /> trying to accomplish is an internal ystem change in a fund number. have started discuss' about the small amount in legal <br /> There is no change in the fund na ~ e or the fund classification here, transfer. Wear rrently discussing fixing this in FY10 <br /> j and that should be clearly noted in the workpaper footnotes for both f S61 actin en all the funds are reconciled. I will try and <br /> I keep in the loop. <br /> ~ 2. How did you verify that Fund 01~ is indeed budgeting the~$3 ,0 0 <br /> transfer to Fund 341 for. FY10? I don't see evidence here that <br /> we-%' I have verified with John H in the budget office and he will <br /> confirmed that on the other end. ~ ~ be processing the transfer. <br /> 3. Good job overall. This fund number change is kind of ~ - <br /> complicated! <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.