New Search
f. <br /> l <br /> Public Vllorks <br /> Engineering <br /> i <br /> ' Gity of Eugene <br /> ~ ~ i 244 E. Broadway <br /> n . erStan Eugene, OR 97401 <br /> ~ ~n 1~ <br /> es <br /> <br /> -E . ~ ~ 4541 J 682-55fifi <br /> • ~ • <br /> ~1va~e n ~ . <br /> 1nee~e ~o ects <br /> f <br /> r . <br /> . <br /> This fact sheet has been re aced b " the Ci of Eu ene ' <br /> P P y tY g Coss Associated with Review and Inspeet~on of <br /> Public Works Department to explain the charges related to Privately Construcfied Publie Improveni.ents <br /> City staff review and ~nspect~on of privately constructed - , <br /> public improvements. This fact sheet also contains Typically, the private developer hires a private engineer to <br /> information about the invoice sent by the Eugene Public dv design work and a private cantractor to install public <br /> works Department and the billing statement sent by the improvements. The Cify of Eugene is not involved and <br /> .assumes no responsibility for any payment arxangements <br /> City's Administrative Services Department. <br /> between the private developer and the private engineer <br /> General Requirements for Privately Engineered and/or contractor. The Ci of Eu ene char es the rivate <br /> Pro' ects g g p <br /> l developer the cost of reviewing plans, testing, and <br /> i ~ Most residential subdivisions and co inspecting the construction of privately engineered public <br /> mmeraal developmen#s . <br /> in the Eugene area are built b rivate devely ers, These ~mpr°Vements. <br /> Yp p <br /> developments typically include~public streets, wastewater. • Testing Fees. Testing fees are set by local testing <br /> ' facilities, storm drainage facilities, and other types of laboratories and charged directly to the project based on <br /> improvements that are privately engineered and constructed. the number of tests. Examples o£ tests include subgrade and <br /> f The newly constructed public. improvements are inspected backfill compaction, paving density, and concrete strength <br /> analysis. If a test does not yield an approved result; the <br /> and accepted by the City of Eugene and are maintained by ~ material or a licatxan must be corrected and retested, and <br /> . .the City's Public Vl~orks De artment. additional fepesare char ed. <br /> P g <br /> The engineering and construction of privately built ~ • Plan Reviewand inspection Fees. The cost of reviewing <br /> public improvements must conform to requirements and construction plans and inspecting privately engineered <br /> regulations established b the Eu ene Ci Code and the public improvements is based on.the actual amount of <br /> I y g ~ time spent by City staff. Public improvements may include <br /> If Public works Departme~.t to ensure the new assets meet wastewater, storm drainage, curb, gutteir, pavement, and <br /> city standards and the needs of the community. These street lights. <br /> requirements and regulations are detailed in the City's <br /> "Public Im ravement Desi n Standards Manual." Th The City ins ector is available from 7:OD am until 3:00 m. <br /> p . g, e p P <br /> ~vilowing are some of the requirements for privately If the developer's, contractor elects to work extended hours, <br /> constructed public improvements: weekends, or holidays, City charges to the developer shall. <br /> include all City inspector overtime costs associated with an <br /> • The private developer must ~ sign an engineering overtime ins ection and normal travel time to and from the <br /> and construction agreement with the City of Eugene ~ P <br /> acknowledging that alTl applicable requirements and. jobsite. <br /> regulations will be followed. The developer also agrees ~o Hourl x , <br /> pay all fees and charges related to the design review and y aces are set by admua~stra'hve order at the start <br /> ,construction inspection of the project in conformance with of ~ each fiscal year to recover the full cast of ~ engineering <br /> . . <br /> .section 7.130 of the muniapal code. services, rnclud~ng all overhead costs 4as required by <br /> 4) } <br /> - Section 7.1301 of the Eu ene Ci Code <br /> g tY <br /> Privatel en ineered lans for ~ ublic 1m ravem tit <br /> e s must <br /> 'r, <br /> y g p p P <br /> j meet certain specifications for accuracy and completeness For more information vn fees, see Cha ter 4 of the PIDS <br /> as outlined in the PIDS manual and section 7.140 of the P <br /> manual. <br /> mun~cx al code. The Zaps m <br /> ust be reviewed and a roved <br /> P <br /> p <br /> pp <br /> by the City before impxavements are constructed. ~ • As-Constructs & 11 Month warran Ins ection Fees. <br /> tY p <br /> •The City inspects all privately constructed public These fees are to directly recover the costs of reviewing as- <br /> improvements. The developer or property owner must . ~ construct drawings and performing 11-month warranty in- <br /> obtainfin <br /> ^i al ins ection a roval before im rave <br /> p pp p menu can spections. <br /> ~ be transferred. to the City for perpetual maintenance. . <br /> . Small Development (less than $5,000 n~a $344.00 <br /> .These agreements, reviews, and inspections ensure City <br /> 4 Mecli~um Development ($25,000 to $x.00,000) n f <br /> a $580.00 <br /> standards are followed and quality improvements axe .Lai ~ Develo went ( eater $Z~~ oool ~ nJa ~ X20,00 <br /> constructed. This benefits the public by keep~n~ tax-, g p ~ ~ <br /> supported maintenance costs as law as possible and ensures ~ This fee ~ will be charged to the project when the Public <br /> the improvement will last for many years. Improvement Permit is issued. <br /> ~ ' ~cantinued on reverse ~ <br /> r <br /> <br />