New Search
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:23 PM <br /> To: WOLD Eric N <br /> Cc: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Subject: RE: Update on Delta Ponds and Corps funding <br /> Eric, <br /> <br /> Michelle and I talked about this and we believe that the funding should go into the 4003 <br /> GJN. The money from the Corps will be reimbursing funds that we committed to the project <br /> (from 4003 and other funds) in order to bridge the gap while the Corps found a way to <br /> honor their commitment to apply remaining money from last years culvert project to the <br /> wetland bench work. These funds are essential to continue the capital project and as we <br /> understood it, monies spent for our ongoing activities could be used as match to the <br /> grant. This has been our approach to matching other grants with project funds. We should <br /> discuss the best approach to managing these funds in regards to the capital project and <br /> the grant work. I will be out of the office tomorrow and back on Friday. If you would <br /> like to discuss this with Michelle before I return that would be fine. Otherwise we can <br /> talk more on Friday. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Scott <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: WOLD Eric N <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:51 PM <br /> To: SMITH Tammy D; RISDAL Lacey L; MILOVICH Scott R <br /> Subject: RE: Update on Delta Ponds and Corps funding <br /> Tammy, <br /> This is a bit complicated, but at least I'll share the information I have. <br /> <br /> We included $210,150 of this Corps funding as match for our ODFW "Oregon 150" grant. This <br /> grant is assigned contract 2008-05415, has grant code 340, and the project is assigned GJN <br /> 4572. So, one approach might be to show $210,150 as revenue coming into GJN 4572 and the <br /> associated $210,150 in expenses from the Delta Ponds project that Scott is managing get <br /> journaled entried over into GJN 4572. In this way, all the expenses and match for this <br /> grant are in one place. <br /> Does this approach make sense? Is there a better approach? <br /> Eric <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: SMITH Tammy D <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 1:39 PM <br /> To: RISDAL Lacey L; WOLD Eric N; MILOVICH Scott R <br /> Subject: FW: Update on Delta Ponds and Corps funding <br /> Lacey, Eric, or Scott; <br /> <br /> Which Delta Ponds Projects are being funded with the $350K? <br /> Lacey, should I assume that PWA is processing an invoice to the Corp? <br /> Thank you, Tammy <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: SCHOENING Mark A <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 1:25 PM <br /> To: 'Putman, Douglas A NWP' <br /> Cc: MEDLIN Johnny R; MILOVICH Scott R; CAHILL Michelle R; WOLD Eric N; SMITH Tammy D; <br /> CLARK Debbie D <br /> Subject: RE: Update on Delta Ponds and Corps funding <br /> 2 <br /> <br />