New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
PAF3558
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Capital
>
2008
>
PAF3558
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2009 5:19:47 PM
Creation date
12/30/2008 3:27:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Capital
PW_Document_Type_Capital
Project Authorization
PW_Active
Yes
External_View
No
GJN
003558
GL_Project_Number
905144
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> ,From: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 3:35 PM <br /> To: STOTT Gloria J <br /> Cc: NABETA Ned B <br /> Subject: FW: Capital Project Status Report <br /> Hi Gloria, <br /> I <br /> ' Could I have you send a copy of your JE 1/27/00 charging GJN 50098 Permit fees (ACK 311 9333 61862 <br /> 975183)? The GL shows 3 charges for that day($105.33, $235.39, & $2,645.24) <br /> Thanks a bunch, <br /> Pe99Y <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: NABETA Ned B <br /> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 4:31 PM <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: FW: Capital Project Status Report <br /> <br /> i <br /> Peggy, <br /> <br /> j I also noticed that there are several charges under the Permit Fees section. The first charge shown ($1,832.75) should <br /> have been the amount paid for the permits. Could you find out what the DBR adjustments are for? <br /> Thanks....Ned <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: NABETA Ned B <br /> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 4:13 PM <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: Capital Project Status Report <br /> Pe99Y, <br /> I 'ust received the Ca ital Project Status Re ort for the PWF Office Ex ansion Project GJN 50098 and noticed some <br /> J <br /> p J p <br /> p 1 ( ) <br /> numbers that a ear to be wa off. T es <br /> pp y h e charges are for PSF time starting with the Effective Date of 12/1/99. Most of <br /> the PSF charges from this day on appear to be incorrect. The 2/29/00, 3/31/00 and 4/16/00 charges appear to be okay. <br /> The rest seem to be too high. Could you check these charges? <br /> Thanks....Ned <br /> 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.