New Search
Page 1 of 1 <br /> .HAMLIN Pe D <br /> 99Y' <br /> From: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:17 PM <br /> To: MISHOU Betty J <br /> Cc: SCHOENING Mark A; CARLSON Becky A; PETERSON Tish A <br /> Subject: Lane County PW#03102002 <br /> Tracking: Recipient Read <br /> MISHOU Betty J Read: 9/13/2005 2:17 PM <br /> SCHOENING Mark A <br /> CARLSON Becky A <br /> PETERSON Tish A Read: 9/13/2005 2:20 PM <br /> Hi Betty, <br /> This is a follow-up to our conversation regarding how funds are distributed on the courthouse project. Per the agreement, <br /> Lane County granted the City of Eugene $1.6M towards the Courthouse Transportation Improvements. The Federal <br /> Government, through ODOT will provide $4.96M The federal funding changed to Sec 117 funds as listed in the Omnibus <br /> bill. These provide 100% federal share. This type of funding isn't subject to any congressional limitations, which means it <br /> won't be subject to recession (adjusted or reduced). The overall participation split didn't change. The change will be felt in <br /> how the expenses are submitted for payment. Originally, expenses would be submitted to ODOT, who would in turn would <br /> pay them in part from federal funds and in part from dollars deposited into the Local Government Pool Account (Lane <br /> County participation Now expenses will be paid entirely from one funding source or another. The construction contract <br /> & consultant payments will come from the federal funds and local expenses including ROW will come from the Lane <br /> County Participation $$'s. Any federal $$'s programmed for ROW and not used will be re-obligated to construction. The <br /> agreement with Lane County doesn't address this type of detail, but 1 wanted to advise you of the change. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Peggy Hamlin <br /> Financial Analyst <br /> Public Works Administration <br /> 682 5834 <br /> <br /> 9/13/2005 <br /> <br />